Decided to just plow through the next Summary so that I was finally caught up.
I am not expecting the candidates for taking of the Summaries to write stuff
for this one (although I wouldn't mind it =). The idea of having them work
together to write the Summaries has been proposed, but this is g
Guido van Rossum wrote:
This is something I've typed way too many times:
Py> class C():
File "", line 1
class C():
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
It's the asymmetry with functions that gets to me - defining a
function with no arguments still requires parentheses in the
definition s
Evan Jones wrote:
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this thread, it has been one of
those weeks for me.
On Feb 16, 2005, at 2:50, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Evan then understood the feature, and made it possible.
This is very true: it was a very useful exercise.
I can personally accept breakin
Steven Bethard has put together some text to add __new__ to the list of Basic
Customisation methods in the language reference. Would one of the documentation
folks care to take a look at it?
The relevant SF tracker item is http://www.python.org/sf/1156412
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EM
Aahz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005, John J Lee wrote:
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Aahz wrote:
Both entries so far look very good. Perhaps writing python-dev summaries
could be a rotating position?
Or even a joint effort? It's up to the contributors, of course: just
a thought...
That was my original thoug
Aahz wrote:
Both entries so far look very good. Perhaps writing python-dev summaries
could be a rotating position?
Good idea that several people have now suggested to me. I have emailed Tim,
Steve, and Tony to see what they think. It wouldn't surprise me if this
happens if for any other reason
This entry in Misc/NEWS
"""
- SF patch 995225: The test file testtar.tar accidentally contained
CVS keywords (like $Id: NEWS,v 1.1266 2005/03/05 02:53:17 gward Exp $), which
could cause spurious failures in
test_tarfile.py depending on how the test file was checked out.
"""
just caused a co
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005, John J Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Aahz wrote:
>>
>> Both entries so far look very good. Perhaps writing python-dev summaries
>> could be a rotating position?
>
> Or even a joint effort? It's up to the contributors, of course: just
> a thought...
That was my origina
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Aahz wrote:
> Both entries so far look very good. Perhaps writing python-dev summaries
> could be a rotating position?
Or even a joint effort? It's up to the contributors, of course: just
a thought...
John
___
Python-Dev mailing
Both entries so far look very good. Perhaps writing python-dev summaries
could be a rotating position?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"The joy of coding Python should be in seeing short, concise, readable
classes that express a lot of action in a sm
Here's another two skipped threads. Ditto Tim Lesher's "comments,
criticisms, or rotten tomatoes" request. =)
-
2.3.5 and 2.4.1 release plans
-
Anthony Baxter, Alex Martelli and Tim Peters squelched a bug where
deepcopy faile
At 04:01 PM 3/4/05 -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
Florent's DeadlockDebugger in turn builds on an external C threadframe module:
http://www.majid.info/mylos/stories/2004/06/10/threadframe.html
Folding the functionality of that (or similar functionality) into the
core would, IMO, be a valuable additio
Florent Guillaume recently wrote a valuable addin for Zope:
http://www.zope.org/Members/nuxeo/Products/DeadlockDebugger
When a Zope has threads that are hung, this can give a report of
Python's current state (stack trace) across all threads -- even the
ones that are hung (the deadlocked threa
"Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just mistakenly checked in import.c; I have "outdated"
> this checkin (cvs admin -o 2.241 import.c). If you happened
> to have checked-out import.c in-between, don't be surprised
> if the version numbers go backwards.
Oh! Oops. python-checkins s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Python
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv22139/Python
>
> Modified Files:
> import.c
> Log Message:
> Patch #1043890: tarfile: add extractall() method.
Uh, did you mean to check import.c in here?
C
I just mistakenly checked in import.c; I have "outdated"
this checkin (cvs admin -o 2.241 import.c). If you happened
to have checked-out import.c in-between, don't be surprised
if the version numbers go backwards.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing li
Here are sample summaries of two "skipped threads". If anyone has
comments, criticisms, or rotten tomatoes, let me know.
---
Replacing list of constants with tuple of constants
---
Skip Montanaro notic
Michael Hudson wrote:
PS: this beahviour seems odd already:
decimal.getcontext().abs(1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
File "/Users/mwh/Source/python/dist/src/Lib/decimal.py", line 2321, in abs
return a.__abs__(context=self)
TypeError: wrapper __abs__ doesn't take
Guido van Rossum wrote:
No, the reason is that if we did this with exceptions, it would be
liable to mask errors; an exception does not necessarily originate
immediately with the code you invoked, it could have been raised by
something else that was invoked by that code. The special value
NotImplem
19 matches
Mail list logo