On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:39:42 -0500, Greg Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05 March 2005, Nick Coghlan said:
> > Steven Bethard has put together some text to add __new__ to the list of
> > Basic Customisation methods in the language reference. Would one of the
> > documentation folks care to take
I just discovered that the ossaudiodev test fails on Linux 2.6 with
ALSA's OSS emulation layer. I'm pretty sure this can be blamed on ALSA
(The difference is this: if you pass bogus sampling parameters to
setparameters(), OSS will accept the request and set the hardware to
something reasonable, wh
On 05 March 2005, Nick Coghlan said:
> Steven Bethard has put together some text to add __new__ to the list of
> Basic Customisation methods in the language reference. Would one of the
> documentation folks care to take a look at it?
I've tried to tighten up the text there and hopefully make it
Brett C. wrote:
Assuming a code review says the patch is sane, do we want to go with
this garbage collection change? From past discussions I don't remember
a consensus on acceptance or rejection, just lots of discussion about
ripping out the hacks to allow freeing memory w/o holding the GIL (I
