On 5/30/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noam's suggestion seems reasonable to me, but I'm not
> sure what the performance implications are.
I think that they are not critical. The number of lines can grow by at
most twice, because shorter words would not have a line of their own.
The
On 6/5/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >> @with_template
> >> def closing(obj):
> >> try:
> >> yield obj
> >> finally:
> >> obj.close()
> >>
> > I just realized this has a race condition. The bytecode for the
> > expre
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> @with_template
>> def closing(obj):
>> try:
>> yield obj
>> finally:
>> obj.close()
>>
> I just realized this has a race condition. The bytecode for the
> expression closing(open("...")) must necessarily contain a bytecode
> that calls
On 6/1/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope that I've got the rewrite of PEP 343 to include generator
> extensions right now. I've chosen the 'with' keyword. Please review
> here; I think this is ready for review by the unwashed masses. :-)
>
> http://www.python.org/peps/pep-
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 12:26 -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Florencio Cano Gabarda wrote:
> > I would like to do the new SSL module as good as possible. A piece of
> > art and efficiency if possible and obviusly having in mind all
> > programming standards.
>
> Guido and much of the community would
