On 9/11/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Often the needs of certain user groups and the development speeds of
> > such 3rd party modules are so different that it simply doesn't make
> > sense to fold them in the Python distribution anyway -- consider what
>
On 9/11/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/05, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I and my colleges use IDLE intensively - that is, a heavily patched
> > IDLE. It includes my patch and many other improvements made by me and
> > my friends.
> >
> > The improved IDLE i
On Sep 10, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> I had that in mind when I wrote my post; changing types is not the
> way, that will not work. That is why I proposed __future__ (I really
> do not know very well the implementation details of that feature)
> because I think the parser/compiler
Hi,
I found a bug in Python interactive command line (program python alone:
looks to be code.interact() function in code.py). With UTF-8 locale, the
command << u"é" >> returns << u'\xc3\xa9' >> and not << u'\xE9' >>.
Remember: the french e with acute is Unicode 233 (0xE9), encoded \xC3
\xA9 in UTF
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Often the needs of certain user groups and the development speeds of
> such 3rd party modules are so different that it simply doesn't make
> sense to fold them in the Python distribution anyway -- consider what
> you would have to do if Kurt accepted your patches: you'll s
On 9/10/05, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For methods on standard objects like dicts it's not really possible
> > either way; the type of a dict is determined by the module containing
> > the code creating it, not the module
On 9/10/05, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I and my colleges use IDLE intensively - that is, a heavily patched
> IDLE. It includes my patch and many other improvements made by me and
> my friends.
>
> The improved IDLE is MUCH better than the standard IDLE, especially
> for interactive
Hello,
More than a year and a half ago, I posted a big patch to IDLE which
adds support for completion and much better calltips, along with some
other improvements. Since then, I had some mail conversations with
Kurt B. Kaiser, who is responsible for IDLE, which resulted in
nothing. My last mail,
After nine months of hard work, I am proud to introduce my baby to the
world: an experimental Python-to-C++ compiler. It can convert many
Python programs into optimized C++ code, without any user intervention
such as adding type declarations. It uses rather advanced static type
inference techniques
Jason, this mailing list is related to Python development. If you are
a new at Python, a far better place for help is comp.lang.python
group. Please go to Google Grups and take a look. If you do a search
in those archives, you will find many good links.
--
Lisandro Dalcín
---
Centro
On 9/9/05, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the builtins, it would actually be possible to do this by simply
> importing an alternate builtins module. Something like
>
> from future_builtins import min, max, zip, range
>
Yes. A straightforward solution...
> For methods on
Hi,
In Python 2.4.1, Python/sysmodule.c includes a function PySys_SetArgv().
One of the things it does is attempt to resolve symbolic links into
absolute paths. Currently, it uses readlink() if configure found that
your system supports it, and then it tries to do the same thing again
using realpa
On 9/9/05, Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would
> provide a REALLY nice migration path if it were possible to write
> Python 3.0 code in Python 2.x (for large values of x) so long as you
> included an appropriate preamble of "from __future__ import" statements.
Perhaps I
On 9/9/05, holger krekel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It matters because "metaclass = type" is completely obscure. How would
> > any non-expert have a clue what it means?
>
> How would this non-expert have a clue what
> "from __future__ import new_style_classes" means?
>
That is the point!
Hi My name is Jason & i have a great interest in progamming whether it
be python or what have you. From my understanding Python is written in C
right ? I am willing to do grunt work just to learn .I a quick to catch
on given the right path to follow.Please let me know if you will let me
learn help
Am Samstag, 10. September 2005 04:27 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Update of /cvsroot/python/python/dist/src/Lib
> In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv3622
>
> Modified Files:
> urllib.py
> Log Message:
> Simplify and speed-up quote_plus().
>
> Index: urllib.py
> ===
16 matches
Mail list logo