Micah Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ``FIXME (XXX, DEBUG, BROKEN, REFACTOR, REFACT, RFCTR, OOPS, SMELL, NEEDSWORK,
> INSPECT)``
>*Fix me*: Areas of problematic or ugly code needing refactoring or
>cleanup.
I think the standard should not have codetags that are synonyms.
This is Pyth
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005, Anthony Baxter wrote:
>
> So here we go - the release24-maint branch will be frozen from
> midnight UTC on Wednesday the 28th (about 36 hours from now). This is
> to cut 2.4.2 (final).
>
> If you have any pending patches you want to see landed on the branch,
> mail me abou
So here we go - the release24-maint branch will be frozen from
midnight UTC on Wednesday the 28th (about 36 hours from now). This is
to cut 2.4.2 (final).
If you have any pending patches you want to see landed on the branch,
mail me about them - and do it soon!
There's been a bunch of fixes s
I don't remember where I read (here around probably) that having a
"client pluggable" syntax was not good for python because then ,and more
blah blah.I believed it was a rule of the thumb..
But ,when a client programmer like me writes code he tries to give a
clean, unambigous interface/syntax fo
On Saturday 2005-09-24 04:21, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Never wrote a single line, and may have not read one (in DDJ? Byte?) for
> 15-20 years. How do *you* read such C? Cond 'Qmark' ?
I seldom have to read C code aloud, and the ?: operator is
rare-ish; but I would suggest reading a?b:c as "a c
