Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> Can you expand on why you think this approach is fundamentally flawed?
I would expect that you allocate in the process memory that needs to
outlive the arena, e.g. python strings. The fundamental problem is that
the arena deallocation cannot know whether such memory exists,
On 12/1/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> > I'm not sure what your intent for this work is, but I'd like to create
> > a parallel arena branch and compare the results. I'll start work on
> > that tomorrow.
>
> I certainly want the PyObject* branch to become
Skip,
Thanks for the detailed post indicating what stuff you find useful, and what
stuff you don't need. It seems that your use case is fairly unusual, so I
completely understand that you have optimized how you use logging. I will
consider how to try to incorporate your feedback without breaking b
Aahz wrote:
> While cleaning up some old CDs, I discovered that I had received some
> backups of the CVS repository. Should we repeat the exercise for SVN?
No *exactly* sure what you are asking: if you mean that you had been
producing regular backups of the CVS tarball, and ask whether you should
While cleaning up some old CDs, I discovered that I had received some
backups of the CVS repository. Should we repeat the exercise for SVN?
--
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Don't listen to schmucks on USENET when making legal decisions. Hire
yoursel
