Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Neal Norwitz
On 12/23/05, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://docs.python.org/dev/results/ > > Wow! You get no test failures! I guess nobody tests on Windows > anymore. I've been getting test failures for months, and just Hmmm, I thought others were running the tests on Windows too. Th

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Tim Peters
[Neal Norwitz] > ... > I couldn't let Trent have all the fun. > > http://docs.python.org/dev/ > > And hopefully of interest to many here: > > http://docs.python.org/dev/results/ Wow! You get no test failures! I guess nobody tests on Windows anymore. I've been getting test failures for m

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Trent Mick
[Neal Norwitz wrote] > I couldn't let Trent have all the fun. > > http://docs.python.org/dev/ Yah, I'd had a great time. Back to Xmas drinking. Cheers, Trent -- Trent Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http:

[Python-Dev] Weekly Python Patch/Bug Summary

2005-12-23 Thread Kurt B. Kaiser
Patch / Bug Summary ___ Patches : 379 open ( -4) / 3002 closed (+12) / 3381 total ( +8) Bugs: 914 open (-13) / 5452 closed (+37) / 6366 total (+24) RFE : 204 open ( +0) / 193 closed ( +1) / 397 total ( +1) New / Reopened Patches __ Some fixe

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Brett Cannon
On 12/23/05, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So for at least the time being they go up nightly > > (http://www.trentm.com/python). I don't know what Trent did to make that > > happen, but he did it fairly quickly. I doubt

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Neal Norwitz
On 12/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So for at least the time being they go up nightly > (http://www.trentm.com/python). I don't know what Trent did to make that > happen, but he did it fairly quickly. I doubt it would be hard to replicate > on the docs server. I couldn'

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread skip
>> That may not be a good thing. Documentation fixes should go online >> much quicker than with every Python release, or am I mistaken? Robey> Yes, I think that's obviously ridiculous on the face of it, since Robey> fixes to the python 2.4 docs may be useless by the time 2.5 comes

Re: [Python-Dev] Patch reviews & request for patch review

2005-12-23 Thread Neal Norwitz
On 12/5/05, John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm hoping one of those nice people who offered 'review 5 get 1 free' > might look at a patch of mine. Oooh, ooh, do I count?!? (Well, you can drop the nice part. :-) > http://python.org/sf/1157027 Checked in to 2.5. > http://python.org/sf/

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Robey Pointer
On 23 Dec 2005, at 0:53, Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > Robey Pointer wrote: >> On 22 Dec 2005, at 3:51, Michael Hudson wrote: >> >>> "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Checked the python-list archives lately? If you google c.l.python for the word "documentation", you'l

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread skip
Robey> I can only speak for my own experience, but maybe it will help. Robey> I once tried to help fix a piece of the python docs. The Robey> description of Py_UNICODE on Robey> was Robey> -- and still is -- incorrect. Check he

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > > I can only speak for my own experience, but maybe it will help. I > > once tried to help fix a piece of the python docs. The description > > of Py_UNICODE on was > > -- and still is -- incorrect. > > The current docs

Re: [Python-Dev] status of development documentation

2005-12-23 Thread Reinhold Birkenfeld
Robey Pointer wrote: > On 22 Dec 2005, at 3:51, Michael Hudson wrote: > >> "Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Checked the python-list archives lately? If you google c.l.python >>> for the >>> word "documentation", you'll find recent megathreads with subjects >>> like >>> "bitc

Re: [Python-Dev] reST limitations? (was Re: status of development documentation)

2005-12-23 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Martin Blais wrote: > > So, definitions of functions, classes, and other structured stuff would > > just use fields under a directive, and references to those definitions > > would just be reST links. > > So you end up with a document with a bunch of custom directives, like:: > > .. python-class::