Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 391 open ( +7) / 3028 closed (+12) / 3419 total (+19)
Bugs: 906 open ( -3) / 5519 closed (+19) / 6425 total (+16)
RFE : 207 open ( -1) / 197 closed ( +1) / 404 total ( +0)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Patch for
Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 391 open ( +7) / 3028 closed (+12) / 3419 total (+19)
Bugs: 905 open ( -4) / 5519 closed (+19) / 6424 total (+15)
RFE : 207 open ( -1) / 197 closed ( +1) / 404 total ( +0)
New / Reopened Patches
__
Patch for
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:01:36PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> * test_pty is brittle on solaris 10, sometimes it works, sometimes not
Do we have a Solaris 10 box to test on? I think I wrote most of test_pty,
and I can see if I can pin down the problem, but I don't have a Solaris 10
box myself.
On 1/11/06, Trent Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Does that make sense? We would just need /f's script in SVN.
> >
> > in python/Tools/something or sandbox/something ?
>
> python/Doc/tools/something?
Fredrik were you still working on that? I can make the changes to the
bb master. I though
I would really like to stabilize a bunch of the current rough edges in
2.5. We are likely to have enough instability with the PEP 353
changes, so it would be better to fix some of these issues sooner
rather than later. There are a bunch of tests that are not stable.
It would really help to get p
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> > > Have you studied wikipedia's approach? It's multi-layered and worth
> > > learning from (start with their FAQ on editing).
> > >
> > > (And by the way, I am *not* advocating writing the docs as one big
> > > wikipedia -- only the user commentary.)
> >
> > to clarify, I
> > Have you studied wikipedia's approach? It's multi-layered and worth
> > learning from (start with their FAQ on editing).
> >
> > (And by the way, I am *not* advocating writing the docs as one big
> > wikipedia -- only the user commentary.)
>
> to clarify, I'm advocating maintaining the docs via
