On Thursday 09 November 2006 16:30, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Patch #841454 takes a stab at cross-compilation
> (for MingW32 on a Linux system, in this case),
> and proposes to use SCons instead of setup.py
> to compile extension modules. Usage of SCons
> would be restricted to cross-compilation (fo
Patch #841454 takes a stab at cross-compilation
(for MingW32 on a Linux system, in this case),
and proposes to use SCons instead of setup.py
to compile extension modules. Usage of SCons
would be restricted to cross-compilation (for
the moment).
What do you think?
Regards,
Martin
_
Greg Ewing schrieb:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>> a) the directory cache is out of date, and you should
>>re-read the directory
>> b) the module still isn't there, but is available in
>>a later directory on sys.path (which hasn't yet
>>been visited)
>> c) the module isn't there at all,
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> a) the directory cache is out of date, and you should
>re-read the directory
> b) the module still isn't there, but is available in
>a later directory on sys.path (which hasn't yet
>been visited)
> c) the module isn't there at all, and the import will
>even
On 11/7/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grig Gheorghiu schrieb:
> > One of the Pybots buildslaves running x86 Ubuntu Edgy has been failing
> > the unit test step for the trunk, specifically the test_ucn test.
>
> Something is wrong with the machine. I forced a clean rebuild, and
Hopefully by now you have heard of the "Summer of PyPy", our program
for funding the expenses of attending a sprint for students. If not,
you've just read the essence of the idea :-)
However, the PyPy EU funding period is drawing to an end and there is
now only one sprint left where we can sponso
