Resending this; as i think my sf.net email alias got blocked by the python-dev.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Senthil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar 24, 2007 6:05 AM
Subject: RFC - GoogleSOC proposal -cleanupurllib
To: python-dev@python.org
Hi All,
I have written a proposal to
1. In hindsight, what do you think about PEP 261, the Py_UNICODE_WIDE
build option? On balance, has this been good, bad, or indifferent?
What's good/bad about it?
Unlike MAL, I think it was good choice, primarily for political reasons.
People kept complaining that Python doesn't really
The original went through. You likely didn't get any responses because
the proposal has text that is significantly longer than most other SoC
proposals, and perhaps people just haven't had the time to read it yet.
Also, I don't believe anyone else has posted the full text of their
proposal
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
I have written a proposal to cleanup urllib as part of Google SoC. I am
attaching the file 'soc1' with this email. Requesting you to go through the
proposal and provide any feedback which I can incorporate in my submission.
From your proposal:
2) In all modules, Follow
Hello everyone,
I would like to participate as a student in google Summer of Code and
I'm interested in feedback on a multimedia library for Python.
The library I propose should have the following features:
* the capability to extract and decompress video and audio from a
few common
Lino Mastrodomenico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Is there any interest in a library of this kind (inside or outside of
| the stdlib)?
| Suggestions? Criticism?
There is a Python wrapping of the cross-platform Simple Directmedia Library
(C) that is a major part of
Facundo Batista wrote:
Tests failed because of this commit *only* in alpha Tru64 5.1 trunk
buildbot.
Also it fails in g4 osx.4 trunk. In all the other platforms it works
ok.
As usual, human error.
Now I used the already present threading custom testing architecture in
test_socket.py, and
