Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Facundo Batista wrote:
Sorry, this was an error. I thought you as in plural (in spanish
there're two different words for third person of plural and singular),
and wrote it as is; now, re-reading the parragraph, it's confusing.
So, you-people-in-the-list, do
Travis Oliphant wrote:
Carl Banks wrote:
Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
I think we are getting closer. What do you think about Greg's idea
of basically making the provider the bufferinfo structure and having
the exporter handle copying memory over for shape and strides if it
wants to be
Carl Banks wrote:
Here's a concrete example of where it would be useful: consider a
ByteBufferSlice object. Basically, the object represents a
shared-memory slice of a 1-D array of bytes (for example, Python 3000
bytes object, or an mmap object).
Now, if the ByteBufferSlice object
I've been seeing bounces for Fred Drake's Comcast email for a couple days.
Fred, are you listening? If not, does someone else have a non-Comcast email
link to Fred? (I assume his acm.org address is just an alias which might
well point to his Comcast mailbox.)
Thx,
Skip
There's this bug (#451607) about the needing of tests for socket SSL...
Last interesting update in the tracker is five years ago, and since a
lot of work has been done in test_socket_ssl.py (Brett, Neal, Tim,
George Brandl).
Do you think is useful to leave this bug opened?
Regards,
--
.
Down here in Texas, Comcast subscribers were recently moved to
Roadrunner.. changing email addresses from, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Other parts of the country were
also affected. Is it possible that Fred has been moved also? What part
of the country is he in?
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 17:17, Martin Thomas wrote:
Down here in Texas, Comcast subscribers were recently moved to
Roadrunner.. changing email addresses from, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Other parts of the country were
also affected. Is it possible that Fred has
On 3/28/07, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's this bug (#451607) about the needing of tests for socket SSL...
Last interesting update in the tracker is five years ago, and since a
lot of work has been done in test_socket_ssl.py (Brett, Neal, Tim,
George Brandl).
Do you think
Carl Banks wrote:
/* don't define releasebuffer or lockbuffer */
/* only objects that manage buffers themselves would define these */
That's an advantage, but it's a pretty small one -- the
releasebuffer implementation would be very simple in
this case.
I'm bothered that the releaser field
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:38:45 -0700, Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/28/07, Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's this bug (#451607) about the needing of tests for socket SSL...
Last interesting update in the tracker is five years ago, and since a
lot of work has been done
Carl Banks wrote:
Now object B takes a view of A. If we don't have this field, then B
will have to hold a reference to A, like this:
B - A - R
A would be responsible for keeping track of views,
A isn't keeping track of views, it's keeping track of the
single object R, which it has to
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
Take a look at openssl s_server. This is still a pretty terrible way
to test the SSL functionality, but it's loads better than connecting to
a site on the public internet.
How would you deal with the deployment and maintenance of this server in
all buildbot's
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:22:23 + (UTC), Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
Take a look at openssl s_server. This is still a pretty terrible way
to test the SSL functionality, but it's loads better than connecting to
a site on the public internet.
How would
13 matches
Mail list logo
