On 4/7/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/7/07, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
>
> The name doesn't make it obvious to me what's going on. May
On 4/7/07, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
>
> The name doesn't make it obvious to me what's going on. Maybe
> countunique()? Some other options are countdistinct(
Adam Olsen wrote:
> The name doesn't make it obvious to me what's going on. Maybe
> countunique()?
That doesn't sound any more obvious to me.
counteach? countall?
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailma
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Guido commented in the tracker that it would be worth discussing
> whether that last item (``item_counts['d']``) should return 0 (as a
> defaultdict would) or raise KeyError (as a dict would).
If you've asked for a count of 'd's, and there aren't
any 'd's, the most sensible
On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/1696199
>
> Example usage, from the docstring::
>
> >>> items = 'acabbacba'
>
On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
The name doesn't make it obvious to me what's going on. Maybe
countunique()? Some other options are countdistinct() and
countduplicates().
> >>> items = 'acabbacba'
On 4/7/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch implementing collections.counts() as suggested above:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/1696199
>
> Example usage, from the docstring::
>
> >>> items = 'acabbacba'
> >>> item_counts = counts(items)
> >>> for item in
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (04/01/07 - 04/08/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1647 open ( +0) / 8584 closed ( +0) / 10231 total ( +0)
Average duration of open issues: 758 days.
Medi
On 4/7/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, the *claim* certainly is that minidom supports
> level 2 core. Any proof to the contrary indicates a bug;
> patches are welcome.
OK-- I'll work on this. I can fix the easy ones, anyway.
-j
> Martin, have you looked at this?
Only just now. I assume Andrew is right on these, although
one would have to verify each and every one, reading the spec,
reading the documentation, reading the source, testing, fixing.
Very time-consuming.
In any case, the *claim* certainly is that minidom supp
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Alex Martelli wrote:
>> > If we had a "turn sequence into bag" function somewhere
>> > (and it might be worth having it for other reasons):
>> >
>> > def bagit(seq):
>> > import collections
>> > d = collections.default
On 4/7/07, Andrew Clover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Orendorff wrote:
> > OK, I think this is worthwhile then. :) I'll read the spec and submit
> > a patch.
>
> You're planning to implement EntityReference in minidom? That'll be fun!
> :-) One of the nastier corners of DOM and XML in general
Only one concern:
> typedef int (*getbufferproc)(PyObject *obj, struct bufferinfo *view)
I'd like to see it accept a flags argument over what kind of buffer it's
allowed to return. I'd rather not burden the user to check all the
entries in bufferinfo to make sure it doesn't get something
Jason Orendorff wrote:
> OK, I think this is worthwhile then. :) I'll read the spec and submit
> a patch.
You're planning to implement EntityReference in minidom? That'll be fun!
:-) One of the nastier corners of DOM and XML in general.
> I'd be happy to do some diffing between the implementat
14 matches
Mail list logo
