* James Y Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-08 11:18:44]:
> On May 8, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:14:02AM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> >> I'd like to suggest that we remove all (or nearly all) uses of
> >> xrange from the stdlib. A quick scan shows that m
""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> Just curious why 2to3 would not replace range() with list(range())?
|
| In most usages of range(), using the 3.0 range() will work just as
| well, and be more efficient.
If so, which it would seem from range2x fun
On 08/05/2007 19.37, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Part of the problem might be that we are using an old version of svn
> (1.1) AFAIK. IIRC these operations were sped up in later versions.
Yes they were. If that's the case, then probably the server should be updated.
--
Giovanni Bajo
_
