> The point of this message is to see if anyone thinks 2000 is
> unreasonable. It could probably be raised, but I'm not going to try
> it since I don't have access to a Windows box. Testing this remotely
> sucks.
If this turns out ever to be a limitation, I would challenge the
reporter to rewrit
I had a little argument with the marshal module on Windows last night,
I eventually won. :-)
A patch was checked in which would prevent blowing out the stack and
segfaulting with this code:
marshal.loads( 'c' + ('X' * 4*4) + '{' * 2**20)
Originally, I didn't change the recursion limit which
* Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-18 13:06:41]:
>
> > Site: What is the futorh word of tihs scnnteee?
> > Answer: fourth.
>
> Are you sure it isn't "futorh"?-)
>
:-) My idea was, a human got to answer it unscrambled as 'fourth' as he
"understands" what the question is and gives the pro
O.R.Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> Site: What is the futorh word of tihs scnnteee?
>
> Answer: fourth.
Are you sure it isn't "futorh"?-)
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe
* Andrew McNamara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-17 15:30:43 +1000]:
> technique could be used, but my suspicion is that real people are being
> paid a pittance to sit in front of a PC and spam anything that moves.
http://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome
Complete simple tasks that people do better than
O.R.Senthil Kumaran schrieb:
> * Scott Dial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-17 11:04:46]:
>
>> However, it may also be because instead of using a graphic (which is
>> easily transplanted to another page), it uses ascii art which would
>> require more effort to extract and move to another page.
>
>
* Scott Dial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-17 11:04:46]:
> However, it may also be because instead of using a graphic (which is
> easily transplanted to another page), it uses ascii art which would
> require more effort to extract and move to another page.
Another approach would be a 'text scram
Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 22:17 -0700, Talin wrote:
>> Here's a simple method: Put up a free porn site [...]
>
> Is it known that someone actually implemented this?
I moderate a discussion forum which was abused with this exact attack.
At the time, it was a phpBB forum which h
On 5/17/07, Hrvoje Nikšić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 22:17 -0700, Talin wrote:
> > Here's a simple method: Put up a free porn site [...]
>
> Is it known that someone actually implemented this? It's a neat trick,
> but as far as I know, it started as a thought experiment of
Talin wrote:
> Here's a simple method: Put up a free porn site, with a front page that
> says "you must be 18 or older to enter". The page also has a captcha to
> verify that you are a real person. But here's the trick: The captcha is
> actually a proxy to some other site that the spammer is try
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 22:17 -0700, Talin wrote:
> Here's a simple method: Put up a free porn site [...]
Is it known that someone actually implemented this? It's a neat trick,
but as far as I know, it started as a thought experiment of what *could*
be done to fairly easily defeat the captchas, as
11 matches
Mail list logo
