> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond
> Hettinger
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:35 PM
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: [Python-Dev] Py2.6 buildouts to the set API
>
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
On Fri, May 18, 2007, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
>
> * New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
> Logically equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-out
> if a common member is found. The speed-up is potentiall
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen J.
> Turnbull
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 3:10 AM
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Summary of Tracker Issues
>
> O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
>
> > :-) My idea w
Terry Reedy writes:
> Why not simply embargo any post with an off-site link? Tho there might
> have been some, I can't remember a single example of such at SF.
Fine by me; if it doesn't happen often, then embargoing them would be
fine. My occasional experience with distro reporting processes
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
| Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
| hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
| it m
On 18-May-07, at 6:34 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
>
> * New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2).
> Logically equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-
> out if a common member is found. The speed-up is po
Here some ideas that have been proposed for sets:
* New method (proposed by Shane Holloway): s1.isdisjoint(s2). Logically
equivalent to "not s1.intersection(s2)" but has an early-out if a common member
is found. The speed-up is potentially large given two big sets that may
largely overlap or
On 5/18/07, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| I think it would be better to do content. URLs come to mind; without
| something clickable, most commercial spam would be hamstrung. But
| few bug reports and patches need to contain URLs, except for
| specializ
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
> > >
> > > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to ref
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
> >
> > This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
> > decision been made as to whether 2.6 will s
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
> Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
> hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
> it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
This kind of f
On 5/18/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
>
> This is implemented (I'll update the PEP to reflect this). Has a
> decision been made as to whether 2.6 will support both "," and "as" in
> except statements?
I think 'excep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Guido, can you tell me whether the concept of enums for Python is
>> being rejected, or this specific proposal? My proposal would be
>> quite different, and I think, more Pythonic. Should I bot
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
>
> SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
Not yet implemented, will be this weekend.
> SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winte
On 5/18/07, Neal Norwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
>
> SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
> SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
Not yet -- the implementations of t
On 5/18/07, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
> > Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
>
> I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just
Are the following accepted PEPs implemented and should be marked final:
SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000Winter
SA 3110 Catching Exceptions in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> SR 354 Enumerations in Python Finney
> Rejected; not enough interest, not sufficiently Pythonic.
I have a competing proposal for enumerations which I just haven't
gotte
Jeff> 1) How is the project governed? How does the community make
Jeff>decisions on what goes into a release?
Jeff>You know, I've been a member of the Python community for many
Jeff>years -- I know about PEPs, Guido as BDFL, and +1/-1. But I've
Jeff>never fig
Brett Cannon schrieb:
> 4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
>
>I don't have the necessary access to the pydotorg infrastructure
>to answer this -- can someone who does help me out here?
>
>
> According to
> http://www.ohloh.net/projects/26/analyses/latest/
On 5/18/07, Jeff Rush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
Y
On 5/18/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
> > Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
> > 3000. Here's a summary. Please sp
While reviewing PEPs, I stumbled over PEP 335 ( Overloadable Boolean
Operators) by Greg Ewing. I am of two minds of this -- on the one
hand, it's been a long time without any working code or anything. OTOH
it might be quite useful to e.g. numpy folks.
It is time to reject it due to lack of interes
On 5/18/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for t
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:23:46AM -0500, Jeff Rush wrote:
> Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
> cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
>
[snip]
>
> 4) How many committers to the cPython core are there?
>
>I don't have the nece
With the help of Neal Norwitz, Jeremy Hylton, Alex Martelli and Collin
Winter, I've greatly reduced the set of open PEPs numbered less than
3000. Here's a summary. Please speak up if we've made a grave error; I
take all responsibility for the final decisions.
Positive Decisions (Marked Accepted or
Time is short and I'm still looking for answers to some questions about
cPython, so that it makes a good showing in the Forrester survey.
1) How is the project governed? How does the community make decisions
on what goes into a release?
You know, I've been a member of the Python community
O.R.Senthil Kumaran writes:
> :-) My idea was, a human got to answer it unscrambled as 'fourth' as he
> "understands" what the question is and gives the proper answer.
> Agreed, there could be confusion at first.
But for any given user, there's only going to be a first. Either they
pass the
29 matches
Mail list logo
