Neal Norwitz schrieb:
> On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
>> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
>> ../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
>> ../controlled_importlib.py contr
"Darrin Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| First of all 1000 apologies if this is the wrong list. Please redirect
| me if necessary.
Usage questions should usually be directed first to comp.lang.python /
gmane.comp.python.general / python-list (all 3 are int
# Sorry, I posted to inapropreate mailing list. (Python-3000)
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2007-May/060507.html
Hello. I'm using Windows2000, I tried some investigation for
test_ftpwrapper.
After I did this change, most errors were gone.
Index: Lib/urllib.py
First of all 1000 apologies if this is the wrong list. Please redirect
me if necessary.
I'm attempting to build python 2.5.1 fat binaries on OSX and
statically link to a newer sqlite than what ships with OSX. (3.3.17).
I'm getting "Bus Error" early when I run my app. If I turn on a lot of
malloc
On 5/25/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
> soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
> ../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
> ../controlled_importlib.py controlled_importlib.py`` while i
Hoi,
Due to some server issues I had to take the web version down. But expect an
updated version in a few days.
Regards,
Armin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mai
In my bcannon-objcap branch I am trying to check in a change that involves a
soft symlink from Lib/controlled_importlib.py to
../importlib/controlled_importlib.py through ``ln -s
../controlled_importlib.py controlled_importlib.py`` while in the Lib
directory. I have done this before in this branc
Greg,
If you do update this PEP, please update the __not__ portion as well,
at least regarding possible return values.
It currently says that __not__ can return NotImplemented, which falls
back to the current semantics. (Why? to override an explicit
__not__? Then why not just put the current
Thomas Heller wrote:
>>> Are there others that can provide a Windows buildbot? It would probably
>>> be good to have two -- and a WinXP one would be good.
>> It certainly would be good. Unfortunately, Windows users are not that
>> much engaged in the open source culture, so few of them volunteer
>>
At 11:25 AM 5/25/2007 +0200, Neville Grech Neville Grech wrote:
> >From a user's POV, I'm +1 on having overloadable boolean
> functions. In many cases I had to resort to overload add or neg
> instead of and & not, I foresee a lot of cases where the and
> overload could be used to join objects wh
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Ron Adam wrote:
> And for console text output, is the unmodified reST suitable, or would it
> be desired to modify it in some way?
Currently pydoc output looks like a man page under Unix. if it could
look like that then that would be great. Otherwise ra
>> Are there others that can provide a Windows buildbot? It would probably
>> be good to have two -- and a WinXP one would be good.
>
> It certainly would be good. Unfortunately, Windows users are not that
> much engaged in the open source culture, so few of them volunteer
> (plus it's more painfu
Martin v. Löwis schrieb:
> Michael Foord schrieb:
>> This subject is generating a lot of discussion and [almost entirely]
>> positive feedback. It would be a great shame to run out of steam.
>>
>> Does it need a PEP to see a chance of it getting accepted as the formal
>> documentation system? (o
13 matches
Mail list logo
