Aahz wrote:
> Guido has previously given himself explicit permission to violate
> netiquette (including the rule about top-posting).
Only in the Python mailing lists, I hope -- unless
he's declared himself BDFL of the whole Internet
as well. :-)
I suppose he could be considered to have a right to
On Saturday 26 May 2007, Joseph Armbruster wrote:
> I noticed that one of the parts of ConfigParser was not using "for line
> in fp" style of readline-ing :-) So, this will reduce the SLOC by 3
> lines and improve readability. However, I did a quick grep and this
> type of practice appears in
>>> Being able to access the calling frame from IronPython would be really
>>> useful...
We do have a -X:Frames option but it's going to hurt your performance, but for
example:
IronPython 1.0.60816 on .NET 2.0.50727.312
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>>> def f():
...
Dino Viehland wrote:
> Just to chime in from the IronPython side (better late than never I suppose):
>
> If we need to get access to the frame which is calling super then we can make
> that happen in IronPython. It just means that super gets treated like we
> treat eval today and won't work if i
On 5/23/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Peter's machine comes and goes, depending on whether he starts
> the buildbot. Alan McIntyre's machien should be mostly he reliable,
> but nobody really notices if it goes away.
FWIW, my current internet service is less than spectacula
> The buildbot is now working.
Thanks for the effort. If any of the current operators of a Windows
buildbot want to shut down theirs in return, please let me know.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
Thomas Heller schrieb:
>>> Are there others that can provide a Windows buildbot? It would probably
>>> be good to have two -- and a WinXP one would be good.
>>
>> It certainly would be good. Unfortunately, Windows users are not that
>> much engaged in the open source culture, so few of them volunt
