>> What would a registry of tranformation algorithms buy us compared to a
>> module with transformation functions?
>
> Easier registering of custom transformations. Without a registry, you'd have
> to monkey-patch a module.
Or users would have to invoke the module directly.
I think a convention
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Let's definitely add this to the trunk (2.6). It sounds fine to me as
> a bugfix too, since (from your description) it doesn't change the
> behavior at all in CPython.
Great.
It looks to me like the patch will apply fine against release25-maint.
No behaviour change.
Tha
On 6/19/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> > On 6/19/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> we got another feature request for multi-line comments.
> >>
> >> While it is nice to comment out multiple lines at once, every editor
> >> that deserves
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On 6/19/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> we got another feature request for multi-line comments.
>>
>> While it is nice to comment out multiple lines at once, every editor
>> that deserves that name can add a '#' to multiple lines.
>>
>> And there's alwa
Walter Dörwald schrieb:
If a PEP is called for, I'd be happy to at least co-author it.
>>> Codecs are a major exception to Guido's law: Never have a parameter
>>> whose value switches between completely unrelated algorithms.
>>
>> I don't think that applies here. This is more like __import__
Let's definitely add this to the trunk (2.6). It sounds fine to me as
a bugfix too, since (from your description) it doesn't change the
behavior at all in CPython.
I won't have the time to submit this, but I'm sure there are others here who do.
--Guido
On 6/19/07, Michael Foord <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Those are valid concerns. I'm cross-posting this to the python-3000
list in the hope that the PEP's author and defendents can respond. I'm
sure we can work something out.
Please keep further discussion on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
--Guido
On 6/19/07, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/07, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we got another feature request for multi-line comments.
>
> While it is nice to comment out multiple lines at once, every editor
> that deserves that name can add a '#' to multiple lines.
>
> And there's always "if 0" and triple-quoted strings.
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Walter Dörwald schrieb:
>> Georg Brandl wrote:
>>> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please
>> read:
>>
>> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?
Wrt http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3101/
PEP 3101 says Py3K should allow item and attribute access syntax
within string templating expressions but "to limit potential security
issues", access to underscore prefixed names within attribute/item
access expressions will be disallowed.
I am
Hey Guys,
My first post on this list so I hope this is the right place to post and
relevant.
Im rewriting parts of the Blender3D python API that has got a bit old
and needs an update.
Im making a PyList subtype with the C/Python API, this involves
intercepting calls to standard list methods to ma
On 2007-06-19 14:40, Walter Dörwald wrote:
> Georg Brandl wrote:
A minuscule nit: the rot13 codec has no library equivalent, so it won't be
supported anymore :)
>>> Given that there are valid use cases for bytes-to-bytes translations,
>>> and a common API for them would be nice, does it
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Nick Coghlan schrieb:
>> Georg Brandl wrote:
>>> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please read:
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=208549
>>> Thank you! Now I have something to show to interest
Hi,
we got another feature request for multi-line comments.
While it is nice to comment out multiple lines at once, every editor
that deserves that name can add a '#' to multiple lines.
And there's always "if 0" and triple-quoted strings...
Georg
___
Hello all,
I've just submitted a patch on sourceforge to make inspect compatible
with IronPython (and Jython I think). This patch originally comes from
the IPCE ( http://fepy.sf.net ) project by Seo Sanghyeon. It is a
trivial change really.
The patch is number 1739696
http://sourceforge.net/tr
Georg Brandl wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>> I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please read:
>>
>> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=208549
>
> Thank you! Now I have something to show to interested people except "read
> the PEPs".
>
> A minuscule n
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please read:
>
> http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=208549
Thank you! Now I have something to show to interested people except "read
the PEPs".
A minuscule nit: the rot13 codec has no library
17 matches
Mail list logo
