Patch / Bug Summary
___
Patches : 392 open ( +7) / 3792 closed ( +2) / 4184 total ( +9)
Bugs: 1042 open (+13) / 6757 closed (+13) / 7799 total (+26)
RFE : 263 open ( +1) / 292 closed ( +1) / 555 total ( +2)
New / Reopened Patches
__
"%d" form
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> From: "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> But doesn't the very same argument also apply against islice(), which
>> you just offered as an alternative?
>
> Not really. The use cases for islice() typically do not involve
> repeated slices of an iterator unless it i
On 7/9/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > On 7/8/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> As with the current ``__name__`` attribute, setting ``__package__`` will
> >> be the responsibility of the PEP 302 loader used to import a module.
> >> Loaders which
From: "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> But doesn't the very same argument also apply against islice(), which
> you just offered as an alternative?
Not really. The use cases for islice() typically do not involve
repeated slices of an iterator unless it is slicing off the front
few elements
On 08/07/07, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This script appears to have been producing exactly the same output since
> June 9. I can't believe it's useful information.
It has one positive aspect for me - it's reassured me that the spate
of spam which hit the new tracker a month or two a
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On 7/8/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As with the current ``__name__`` attribute, setting ``__package__`` will
>> be the responsibility of the PEP 302 loader used to import a module.
>> Loaders which use ``imp.new_module()`` to create the module object will
>>
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 7/9/07, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, as a practical matter, I think it is a bad idea to introduce
>> __getitem__ style access to itertools because the starting point
>> moves with each consecutive access:
>>
>> # access items 0, 2, 5, 9, 14,
