Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Any comments?
-1. First, (as already discussed on the tracker,) xml is a bad name
for an encoding. How would you encode Hello in xml?
Then how about the suggested xml-auto-detect?
Then, I'd claim that the problem that the codec solves doesn't really
exist. IOW, most
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/01/07 - 11/08/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1319 open (+18) / 11570 closed (+19) / 12889 total (+37)
Open issues with patches: 419
Average
Then how about the suggested xml-auto-detect?
That is better.
Then, I'd claim that the problem that the codec solves doesn't really
exist. IOW, most XML parsers implement the auto-detection of encodings,
anyway, and this is where architecturally this functionality belongs.
But not all XML
ci = codecs.lookup(xml-auto-detect)
p = expat.ParserCreate()
e = utf-32
s = (u?xml version='1.0' encoding=%r?foo/ % e).encode(e)
s = ci.encode(ci.decode(s)[0], encoding=utf-8)[0]
p.Parse(s, True)
So how come the document being parsed is recognized as UTF-8?
OK, so should I put the C code
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Then how about the suggested xml-auto-detect?
That is better.
OK.
Then, I'd claim that the problem that the codec solves doesn't really
exist. IOW, most XML parsers implement the auto-detection of encodings,
anyway, and this is where architecturally this
I thought the hell of stripping trailing Ls off of stringed numbers was gone
but it appears that the hex() and oct() builtins still leave the trailing
'L' on longs:
Python 2.6a0 (trunk:58846M, Nov 4 2007, 15:44:12)
[GCC 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or
On Nov 8, 2007 6:05 PM, Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the hell of stripping trailing Ls off of stringed numbers was gone
but it appears that the hex() and oct() builtins still leave the trailing
'L' on longs:
Python 2.6a0 (trunk:58846M, Nov 4 2007, 15:44:12)
[GCC 4.1.2
