Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
Cannon:
> On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have been developing in Python since 1.5, and now have to support 2.1
> > as a minimum version. I do like to keep my code runnable on newer
> > versio
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been developing in Python since 1.5, and now have to support 2.1
> as a minimum version. I do like to keep my code runnable on newer
> versions however, and am considering the feasability of forward
> compatibility with Pyt
I have been developing in Python since 1.5, and now have to support 2.1
as a minimum version. I do like to keep my code runnable on newer
versions however, and am considering the feasability of forward
compatibility with Python 3.0.
I also notice the Leo[1] project could use some assistance with
>>> First, XML-RPC is not the only mechanism using XML over a network
>>> connection. Second, you don't want to do this if you're dealing
>>> with several 100 MB of data just because you want to figure
>>> out the encoding.
>> That's my original claim/question: what SPECIFIC application do
>> you h
On 2007-11-11 18:56, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> First, XML-RPC is not the only mechanism using XML over a network
>> connection. Second, you don't want to do this if you're dealing
>> with several 100 MB of data just because you want to figure
>> out the encoding.
>
> That's my original claim/quest
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/04/07 - 11/11/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1323 open (+21) / 11582 closed (+19) / 12905 total (+40)
Open issues with patches: 419
Average durati
> First, XML-RPC is not the only mechanism using XML over a network
> connection. Second, you don't want to do this if you're dealing
> with several 100 MB of data just because you want to figure
> out the encoding.
That's my original claim/question: what SPECIFIC application do
you have in mind t
On 2007-11-11 14:51, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
A non-seekable stream is not all that uncommon in network processing.
>>> Right. But what is the relationship to XML encoding autodetection?
>> It pops up whenever you need to detect the encoding of the
>> incoming XML data on the network connection,
>>> A non-seekable stream is not all that uncommon in network processing.
>> Right. But what is the relationship to XML encoding autodetection?
>
> It pops up whenever you need to detect the encoding of the
> incoming XML data on the network connection, e.g. in XML RPC
> or data upload mechanisms.
> I don't know. Is an XML document ill-formed if it doesn't contain an
> XML declaration, is not in UTF-8 or UTF-8, but there's external
> encoding info?
If there is external encoding info, matching the actual encoding,
it would be well-formed. Of course, preserving that information would
be up to
On 2007-11-10 09:54, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> A non-seekable stream is not all that uncommon in network processing.
>
> Right. But what is the relationship to XML encoding autodetection?
It pops up whenever you need to detect the encoding of the
incoming XML data on the network connection, e.g.
11 matches
Mail list logo
