>On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
>> Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
>> and move on.
>
>If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
>Martin's right: there
Please indulge this off-topic post. I know there are a lot of Python
developers here whose mother tongue is not English; would those folks
mind participating in the experiment below?
--Guido
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jose Oriol Lopez Berengueres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 1
On Nov 11, 2007 7:24 PM, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham wants to convert his code such that it works on both Python 2.x
> (probably even early versions of it?) & Python 3.x. Not 2 instances of
> code, but one source that works on both 2.x and 3.x...
The transition strategy for 3.0
Collin Winter wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
>>> Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
>>> Cannon:
On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I h
On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
> >
> > Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
> > Cannon:
> > > On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have been developi
On Nov 12, 2007 12:50 AM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
> >
> > Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
> > Cannon:
> > > On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I have been developi
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (11/05/07 - 11/12/07)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1321 open (+17) / 11592 closed (+21) / 12913 total (+38)
Open issues with patches: 418
Average durati
On Nov 12, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Bill Janssen wrote:
> In os.path? os.path.encoding(location)?
I wasn't thinking it would be that general; determining the encoding
for an arbitrary text file is a larger problem than it is for an XML
file.
An implementation based strictly on the rules from the
> Simply, it's sometimes desired to know the encoding for purposes that
> don't require immediate decoding. A function would be quite handy
> in these cases.
In os.path? os.path.encoding(location)?
Bill
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.o
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Walter Dörwald wrote:
> It isn't "embedded". codecs.detect_xml_encoding() is callable without
> any problems (though not documented).
"Not documented" means not available, I think.
> Who would use such a function for what?
Being able to detect the encoding can be use
Fred Drake wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
>> Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
>> and move on.
>
> If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself.
> Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here
> and move on.
If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well.
Martin's right: there's no v
On 2007-11-11 23:22, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
First, XML-RPC is not the only mechanism using XML over a network
connection. Second, you don't want to do this if you're dealing
with several 100 MB of data just because you want to figure
out the encoding.
>>> That's my original clai
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> > In case it isn't clear - this is exactly my view also.
>>
>> But is there an API to do it? As MAL points out that API would have
>> to return not an encoding, but a pair of an encoding and the rewound
>> stream.
>
> The API wouldn't operate on streams. Instead, you
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>> I don't know. Is an XML document ill-formed if it doesn't contain an
>> XML declaration, is not in UTF-8 or UTF-8, but there's external
>> encoding info?
>
> If there is external encoding info, matching the actual encoding,
> it would be well-formed. Of course, preserving
On 12 Nov 2007, 03:24:34, Jan Claeys wrote:
>
> Op zondag 11-11-2007 om 17:19 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef Brett
> Cannon:
> > On Nov 11, 2007 4:00 PM, Graham Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have been developing in Python since 1.5, and now have to support 2.1
> > > as a minimum version
16 matches
Mail list logo
