Re: [Python-Dev] integer subclass range behavior

2007-12-19 Thread Guido van Rossum
Can you submit a bug at bugs.python.org? The minimal example I found: >>> class a(int): pass ... >>> for i in range(0, a(5)): pass ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in SystemError: Objects/longobject.c:400: bad argument to internal function >>> On Dec 19, 2007 5:38 PM,

Re: [Python-Dev] Spurious Buildbot Reports

2007-12-19 Thread Titus Brown
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:58:35PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: -> On Dec 19, 2007 4:33 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -> > The bots are kicking-off so many false alarms that it is becoming difficult to tell whether a check-in genuinely broke a build. -> > -> > At the root of the p

Re: [Python-Dev] Spurious Buildbot Reports

2007-12-19 Thread Brett Cannon
On Dec 19, 2007 4:33 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The bots are kicking-off so many false alarms that it is becoming difficult > to tell whether a check-in genuinely broke a build. > > At the root of the problem is a number of tests in the test suite that > randomly blow-up.

[Python-Dev] integer subclass range behavior

2007-12-19 Thread Joseph Armbruster
All, I posted this up to comp.lang.python earlier today and asked a few questions around IRC. The general consensus appeared to be that this was a bug. Before opening up an issue on it, I wanted to run it by this list first (just in case) Here is a copy / paste from comp.lang.python: URL:

[Python-Dev] Spurious Buildbot Reports

2007-12-19 Thread Raymond Hettinger
The bots are kicking-off so many false alarms that it is becoming difficult to tell whether a check-in genuinely broke a build. At the root of the problem is a number of tests in the test suite that randomly blow-up. I now tend to automatically dismiss failures in test_logging and test_threadi