Gregory P. Smith wrote:
My main suggestion was going to be the ability to turn it off as you already
mentioned. However, please consider leaving it off by default to avoid
problems for installed python scripts importing user supplied code. For
shared hosting environments where this becomes
I'm sure you've heard most/all of this before but..it..just..seems..so..true...
Finally this week I've written (ported from sh) a bunch of Perl, 2000 sparse
lines.
While it sure beats Perl, it has some glaring flaws, more glaring due to
its overall goodness.
I feel compelled to voice my
This is a VERY VERY rough draft of a PEP. The idea is that there should be
some formal way that reST parsers can differentiate (in docstrings) between
variable/function names and identical English words, within comments.
PEP: XXX
Title: Catching unmarked identifiers in docstrings
Version:
how about that py 2.5.2 release. anybody? =D
On Jan 3, 2008 2:05 PM, Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.x fixes, because there's no schedule for 2.6.
Eh? PEP 3000 has a schedule that includes 2.6:
OK, no schedule that I knew about :-). I'll get back to work on it.
Bill
On Jan 4, 2008 2:46 AM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See http://bugs.python.org/issue1731. Should we consider it safe to
backport r57216 to 2.5.2? This is Thomas Wouters's code to disable
spurious tracebacks when daemon threads die. We're running some 2.4
apps with (a variant of)
Jay schrieb:
Only addressing the easier points here:
#--
# flaw #2
#
# In functions, reads are scoped. Writes are not.
#
A = 1
def F1():
A = 2 # not an error
def F2():
#B = A # error
A = 3
F1()
F2()
The previous four posts were dredged out of the holding pen in Mailman.
Sorry for the delay.
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
It would make more sense to redirect criticism out of beginners'
ignorance to comp.lang.python rather than spend time discussing their
misunderstandings here.
On Jan 13, 2008 9:28 AM, Georg Brandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay schrieb:
Only addressing the easier points here:
On 1/13/08, Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory P. Smith wrote:
My main suggestion was going to be the ability to turn it off as you
already
mentioned. However, please consider leaving it off by default to avoid
problems for installed python scripts importing user supplied
Gregory P. Smith wrote:
I also tried to check if os.stat(__main__.__file__).st_uid ==
os.getuid() but the real __main__ is not available in site.py. It's
loaded and assigned much later.
Is sys.argv[0] available at that point?
No, it's not available, too. The 'site' module is imported by
On Jan 12, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Not natural, just inefficient and cute. Also, there was no answer
to the question about use cases.
Fair enough. I will present some use cases below.
AFAICT, this feature has never been requested. The closest was a
feature request for
On Jan 12, 2008 8:21 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008 5:09 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the discussion about the new Rational implementation
(http://bugs.python.org/issue1682), Guido and Raymond decided that
Decimal should not implement
I've uploaded a new patch:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1799
Christian
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Jan 13, 2008 6:12 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008 8:21 PM, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008 5:09 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the discussion about the new Rational implementation
On Jan 13, 2008 3:41 PM, Leif Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been watching the python-dev list for very long, so maybe
this has already been discussed ad nauseam (in which case, sorry),
but, from the devil's advocate-ish mathematics side of things, unless
numbers.Decimal is planned
On Jan 13, 2008 7:26 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guido mentioned the possibility briefly at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/007015.html
(One could argue that float and Decimal are :Q, but I'm not sure if
that makes things better pragmatically) but never
[Christian Heimes]
Log:
Added new an better structseq representation. E.g. repr(time.gmtime(0)) now
returns 'time.struct_time(tm_year=1970, tm_mon=1,
tm_mday=1, tm_hour=0, tm_min=0, tm_sec=0, tm_wday=3, tm_yday=1, tm_isdst=0)'
instead of '(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 3, 1, 0)'. The
feature is
On Jan 13, 2008 7:53 PM, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Christian Heimes]
Log:
Added new an better structseq representation. E.g. repr(time.gmtime(0)) now
returns 'time.struct_time(tm_year=1970, tm_mon=1,
tm_mday=1, tm_hour=0, tm_min=0, tm_sec=0, tm_wday=3, tm_yday=1,
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
FWIW, I was looking into something similar but didn't proceed because it
would break eval(repr(s)) == s as the constructor signature
wants all the args in a tuple and won't accept keywords. Still, I think what
you did is a nice improvement.
I agree that
19 matches
Mail list logo
