Was some thought given to possibly adding these as
float methods instead of as separate functions?
float.isinf()
float.isnan()
Also, it would be useful to have a new method, float.is_integer(). This would
be better than the current approach where we make the
test: if x == floor(x).
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008, Steve Holden wrote:
> Douglas Napoleone wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if this is effecting the core svn repository or not, but the
>> conference software (also hosted at svn.python.org) is reporting that
>> the disk is full:
>>
>> [...]
>
> Doug:
>
> You may not be aware that this i
Douglas Napoleone wrote:
> Not sure if this is effecting the core svn repository or not, but the
> conference software (also hosted at svn.python.org) is reporting that
> the disk is full:
>
> Transmitting file data svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Can't create directory
> '/data/r
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> I do think that another (final) 3.0 alpha before PyCon would also be a
>> good idea. This way we can gel the release some more. For 2.6 I think
>> we'll need more alpha releases after PyCon; I doubt the backporting
>> from 3.0 (which has onl
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (01/18/08 - 01/25/08)
Tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1668 open (+31) / 12132 closed (+22) / 13800 total (+53)
Open issues with patches: 421
Average durati
Not sure if this is effecting the core svn repository or not, but the
conference software (also hosted at svn.python.org) is reporting that
the disk is full:
Transmitting file data svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Can't create directory '/data/repos/conference/db/transactions/557-1.tx
Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> Travis, all this make me believe that (perhaps) the 'format'
> specification in the new buffer interface is missing the 'C' or 'F'
> ordering in the case of a countiguos block.
Not strictly necessary, since you can always reverse the
indices when dealing with Fortran if ne
Travis Oliphant wrote:
> You could
> argue that it would be more informative by showing the C-equivalent
> structure as a 2-d array. However, it would also create the possibility
> of confusion by implying an absolute relationship between the C-compiler
> and the type description.
Just to che
On 2/11/08, Travis Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My perception is that you are seeing too much of a connection between
> the C-compiler and the PEP description of memory. Perhaps that's not
> it, and I'm missing something else.
>
Travis, all this make me believe that (perhaps) the 'forma
Thomas Heller wrote:
> Travis Oliphant schrieb:
>
>>
>> The intent of the struct syntax is to handle describing memory. The
>> point is not to replicate how the C-compiler deals with statically
>> defined N-D arrays. Thus, even though the struct syntax allows
>> *communicating* the intent of
10 matches
Mail list logo
