On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I think, however, that the docs should be revised now, for 2.6/3.0.
> In the list of methods under TestCase Objects, the preferred method
> of each
> pair (or triplit) should be given first and the others marked as
> future
> deprecations, not r
At 10:49 PM 4/8/2008 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
>On Tue, April 8, 2008 9:37 pm, Ben Finney
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:37:07 +1000
> > From: Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [Distutils] how to easily consume just the parts of eggs
> > thata
"Michael Foord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Someone please open a bug for this task.
| >
| >
| This sounds like a good compromise and I'm happy to take on the cleanup
| - unless someone else beats me to it. I guess it should wait until 3.0
| final is out of the
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Eric Smith wrote:
>> Because None means 'use the default value'. You probably want:
>> print('a', 'b', sep='', end='')
>
> I think this is a "not optimally designed" API
> because you have to read the documentation to understand why
Excuse me, I do
zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am skeptical that prorgammers are going to be willing to use a new
> database format. They already have a database -- their filesystem --
> and they already have the tools to control it -- mv, rm, and
> PYTHONPATH. Many of them already hate the existence the
>
Committed the patch in r62234. Hopefully the work paid off! (He says moments
before all the buildbots turn red...)
From: Gregory P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 April 2008 20:58
To: Trent Nelson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Cha
zooko wrote:
> 1. You can't conveniently install eggs into a non-system directory,
> such as ~/my-python-stuff.
>
> 2. If you allow even a single egg to be installed into your
> PYTHONPATH, it will change the semantics of your PYTHONPATH.
I discovered another annoyance with eggs the other
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Trent Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the
> proposed patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases)
> can be vetted by a wider audience:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/file9980
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
>
> When I wear my sysadmin hat, eggs become a nuisance.
...
> As a developer, eggs are great.
...
> Fortunately, distutils includes tools like bdist_rpm so that python
> modules can be packaged for easy processing by the system package
> manager. So
All sorted, thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Trent Nelson
> Sent: 08 April 2008 15:48
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Subject: [Python-Dev] [OT] Wingware IDE key for sprinters at PyCon
>
> Anyone happen to have the key handy t
zooko wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> zooko wrote:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
>>> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
>>> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them (into the
On 08/04/2008, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, since I posted my proposal two weeks ago I have pointed a
> couple of Python hackers who currently refuse to use eggs at the URL:
>
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
> They both agreed that it mad
At 10:01 AM 4/8/2008 -0700, zooko wrote:
>On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > zooko wrote:
>
>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>
> >> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
> >> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> «print strings 'a' and 'b' using the default separator and the default
> terminator»
>
> However i'll just cope with it, Python is still the best language ;)
I definitely recommend getting used to this idiom - None is used to
indicate missing (i.e. 'use the default val
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> zooko wrote:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
>> Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python "import"
>> mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them (into the
>> *same* location) on
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> So that print(a, b) does the right thing (i.e. matches the Python 2.x
> print statement's behaviour)
AFAICS print(a, b) does the right thing because default values of "sep" and
"end" are ' ' and '\n' respectively, doesn't it?
Eric Smith wrote:
> Because None means 'use the
Anyone happen to have the key handy that Wingware were giving out to sprinters
at PyCon? For the life of me, I can't find what I did with that piece of
paper. If someone could forward me it off list, that'd be great.
Trent.
___
Python-Dev mailing
[Sorry for the dupes. Lesson: never try and send mail from a moving train.]
Eric Smith wrote:
> Alessandro Guido wrote:
>> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
>> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
>> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.h
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
> Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
> produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
> I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
> pep-3105 and some
> ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce "a b\n" instead of "ab"?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print, pep-3105
and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange behaviour.
Thanks.
-Ale
I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the proposed
patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases) can be
vetted by a wider audience:
http://bugs.python.org/file9980/trunk.2550-2.patch
This patch works towards fixing a large proportion of the te
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > >>OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fin
25 matches
Mail list logo
