Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I'd rather there be OOWTDI so whatever the consensus is is fine
with me.
I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the proposed
patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases) can be
vetted by a wider audience:
http://bugs.python.org/file9980/trunk.2550-2.patch
This patch works towards fixing a large proportion of the
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print, pep-3105
and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange behaviour.
Thanks.
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
pep-3105 and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
pep-3105 and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
pep-3105 and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
pep-3105 and some
ml threads but did not find a good reason justifying such a strange
[Sorry for the dupes. Lesson: never try and send mail from a moving train.]
Eric Smith wrote:
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Can anybody please point me why print('a', 'b', sep=None, end=None) should
produce a b\n instead of ab?
I've read http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#print,
Anyone happen to have the key handy that Wingware were giving out to sprinters
at PyCon? For the life of me, I can't find what I did with that piece of
paper. If someone could forward me it off list, that'd be great.
Trent.
___
Python-Dev
Nick Coghlan wrote:
So that print(a, b) does the right thing (i.e. matches the Python 2.x
print statement's behaviour)
AFAICS print(a, b) does the right thing because default values of sep and
end are ' ' and '\n' respectively, doesn't it?
Eric Smith wrote:
Because None means 'use the
zooko wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
zooko wrote:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python import
mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them (into the
*same*
At 10:01 AM 4/8/2008 -0700, zooko wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
zooko wrote:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-March/078243.html
Here is a simple proposal: make the standard Python import
mechanism notice eggs on the PYTHONPATH and insert them
All sorted, thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Trent Nelson
Sent: 08 April 2008 15:48
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: [Python-Dev] [OT] Wingware IDE key for sprinters at PyCon
Anyone happen to have the key handy that
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Lloyd Kvam wrote:
When I wear my sysadmin hat, eggs become a nuisance.
...
As a developer, eggs are great.
...
Fortunately, distutils includes tools like bdist_rpm so that python
modules can be packaged for easy processing by the system package
manager. So once
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've forwarding my most recent update to issue 2550 here such that the
proposed patch (and in general, the approach to network-oriented test cases)
can be vetted by a wider audience:
Committed the patch in r62234. Hopefully the work paid off! (He says moments
before all the buildbots turn red...)
From: Gregory P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 April 2008 20:58
To: Trent Nelson
Cc: python-dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev]
zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am skeptical that prorgammers are going to be willing to use a new
database format. They already have a database -- their filesystem --
and they already have the tools to control it -- mv, rm, and
PYTHONPATH. Many of them already hate the existence the
Alessandro Guido wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
Because None means 'use the default value'. You probably want:
print('a', 'b', sep='', end='')
I think this is a not optimally designed API
because you have to read the documentation to understand why
Excuse me, I don't know
Michael Foord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Someone please open a bug for this task.
|
|
| This sounds like a good compromise and I'm happy to take on the cleanup
| - unless someone else beats me to it. I guess it should wait until 3.0
| final is out of the door
At 10:49 PM 4/8/2008 -0400, Stanley A. Klein wrote:
On Tue, April 8, 2008 9:37 pm, Ben Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:37:07 +1000
From: Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Distutils] how to easily consume just the parts of eggs
thatare good
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
I think, however, that the docs should be revised now, for 2.6/3.0.
In the list of methods under TestCase Objects, the preferred method
of each
pair (or triplit) should be given first and the others marked as
future
deprecations, not
21 matches
Mail list logo
