Terry Reedy wrote:
In any case, American programmers are not 'average' Americans ;-).
So I say use it!
Plus, think of all the millions of people who will have
their lives enriched by learning to spell 'Rietveld'
properly!
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mail
Boris Borcic wrote:
def inst.bar(...) : ...
def fn[k](...) : ...
should be similarly permitted. Has this ever been discussed ?
Yes, but there didn't seem to be much interest in
the idea. Which is disappointing, because it would
be ideal for setting up function tables and such
like.
O
I reported this: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1006
The tracker is here: http://code.google.com/p/support/issues
Thanks!
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>
>
> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löw
There is a google code support project where google code issues are tracked.
http://code.google.com/p/support/
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a good question. I'll find out.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTE
That's a good question. I'll find out.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum schrieb:
>
>
> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > This code is now open source! Browse it here:
> > > >
> >
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since Americans
can't spell it. :-)
Well, it follows the i before e rule, so I think I will manage.
And it is a nice name, unlike Unix 'creat'.
In any case, Ameri
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This code is now open source! Browse it here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
to me than "the open source
Done. I've sent an invite to this list, but just in case it doesn't
make it, here's the group home page:
http://groups.google.com/group/codereview-discuss
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Raghuram Devarakonda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Are there any mailing lists associated with this proj
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guido> I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since
> Guido> Americans can't spell it. :-) But the open source project *is*
> Guido> called Rietveld, so I suppose I should start using that name...
>
> Which
Guido> I've been reluctant to use the Rietveld name too much since
Guido> Americans can't spell it. :-) But the open source project *is*
Guido> called Rietveld, so I suppose I should start using that name...
Which reminds me... What's it mean? All I saw was a Dutch city and
(maybe?)
> > Are there any mailing lists associated with this project? I looked at
> > google code page but couldn't find any.
>
> Not yet. Do you want me to create a Google group for it?
I think that will be very useful.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-D
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Raghuram Devarakonda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > None of these seem insurmountable, so now that it's open source, I'm
> > looking forward to contributions.
>
> Are there any mail
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This code is now open source! Browse it here:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
>
> Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
> to me than "the open source code review tool"
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None of these seem insurmountable, so now that it's open source, I'm
> looking forward to contributions.
Are there any mailing lists associated with this project? I looked at
google code page but couldn't find any.
> This code is now open source! Browse it here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/source/browse
Are you also going to call it Rietveld then? Sounds better
to me than "the open source code review tool".
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
If you're asking for reasons not to do this:
- AppEngine has a built-in API for dealing with Google Accounts, but
not for OpenID
- Apparently OpenID requires some crypto that would be slow without
additional API support
- I'm not personally familiar with OpenID
None of these seem insurmountable
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I would consider the following sufficient:
1) people who have authenticated themselves against the underlying VCS
(i.e.
proj
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> This is a reminder that the LAST planned alpha releases of Python 2.6 and
> 3.0 are scheduled for next Wednesday, 07-May-2008. Please be diligent over
> the next week so
Mike Klaas wrote:
Another thing to consider is that the def() pattern is only possible
when the bound variable has no dots. A common pattern for me is to
replace an instances method with a lambda to add monitoring hooks or
disable certain functionality:
inst.get_foo = lambda: FakeFoo()
Go
19 matches
Mail list logo
