On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I can't find any PEP about detailed 2.6 -> 3000 migration guidelines,
> specially in the module (C code) extension area. Yes, I know about the
> 2to3 tool, but I'm interested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I can't find any PEP about detailed 2.6 -> 3000 migration guidelines,
specially in the module (C code) extension area. Yes, I know about the
2to3 tool, but I'm interested in updating my 2.x code in order to keep
(automatic via "2to3") difference betwe
> You can start with Visual C++ Express, which is compeltely free ;)
> I don't know if Visual Studio updates the Makefiles.
I would like the makefiles to be ignored entirely. Trent has established
a policy that we compile everything in a single project file, and while
that means some extra work in
> As for PDCurses library itself there is a Makefile in PDCurses
> distribution for Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0+ named vcwin32.mak I can't
> afford buying Visual Studio to test if it works with newer versions, but
> logically Visual Studio should be able to convert Makefile to a newer
> format.
Visu
>
> As for PDCurses library itself there is a Makefile in PDCurses distribution
> for Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0+ named vcwin32.mak I can't afford buying
> Visual Studio to test if it works with newer versions, but logically Visual
> Studio should be able to convert Makefile to a newer format.
You
2008/5/24 techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> For this to have any chance, it *must* work with Visual Studio.
>> Requiring gcc is unacceptable.
>
> As for PDCurses library itself there is a Makefile in PDCurses distribution
> for Microsoft Visual C++ 2.0+ named vcwin32.mak I can't afford buying
> Vi
2008/5/24 techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does anyone would like to include Curses support in Windows from version
> 2.6?
I'd like to see this, although it's hardly crucial for me - however,
"from version 2.6" may be unrealistic at this point.
> It works ok already using the patch from issue #28
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:48 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I would really like to see this as release blocker, because the problem
> > raised once in a while in the past and the windows people who are
> > interested in getting console interface tools usually lack the knowle
> I would really like to see this as release blocker, because the problem
> raised once in a while in the past and the windows people who are
> interested in getting console interface tools usually lack the knowledge
> of unix platform to do the task.
It certainly can't be a release blocker: there
Does anyone would like to include Curses support in Windows from version
2.6?
It works ok already using the patch from issue #2889 and PDCurses library,
but needs expertise of core developers to integrate the patch into the build
system, add library to externals to ship next windows Python with emb
10 matches
Mail list logo
