Hi,
That's just a flaming-sword thread but I want to mention it nonetheless :-)
Basically I propose getting rid of __future__._Feature.getMandatoryRelease()
in favour of __future__._Feature.mandatory. That's backwards compatibile
and much more pythonic. Getters/Setters are considered unpythonic
Guilherme Polo schrieb:
I created an issue 1 week ago (http://bugs.python.org/issue2983)
suggesting the addition of the ttk module to lib-tk, and to the new
tkinter package. Is there any chance to this be accepted for Python
2.6 ?
This may be a good thing to have since it can show that Tkinter
On 6 Giu, 13:27, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - setuptools
>BDFL pronouncement for inclusion in 2.5:
>http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063964.html
I'd like to see more interest about this issue since it's a real shame
that the current distutils is not ev
The parser module exports each function and type twice, once with "AST" in
the name, once with "ST". Since "AST" now has a different meaning for
Python code compilation, I propose to deprecate the "ast" variants in 2.6
and remove them in Python 3000.
(Also, all keyword arguments are called "ast"
I recommend switching back to __int__ and int; even in 2.5, these are
expected to return either an int or a long as required. There's no
need to mess with __long__ at all.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it seems like Integral instances should be
This is not an issue for python-dev, but I have to ask: what do you
mean by "embedded mode"?
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Pau Freixes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> First Hello to all, I have a serious problem for understand some results
> when I'm comparing cpu usages between same
Hi list,
First Hello to all, I have a serious problem for understand some results
when I'm comparing cpu usages between same python code in embedded mode and
standalone mode ( python name_script.py )
This last months I have been writing a program in c like to mod_python for
embedding python lang
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* The 2.6-backported Mapping ABC has the 3.0 dict API,
that is, it uses keys() that returns a view etc.
Curious to hear what Guido thinks about this one.
A nice use of the Mapping ABC is t
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Andrew MacIntyre <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are 2 disparate approaches to clearing/compacting free lists for
> basic types:
> - APIs of the form Py_ClearFreeList() called from gc.collect()
> [class, frame, method, tuple & unicode types];
> - APIs of the fo
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:19 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (just to test your own intuition: when reversed() got added, was
> that more of a language change than when sys.meta_path got
> added?)
I would say they were both core language changes.
Anyway, I will happily drop this
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Facundo Batista wrote:
[...]
Next week we'll have a Python Bug Weekend [3], it's a good moment to gain speed.
[...]
[3] http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonBugDay
That page says the next bug day will be on Sat, June 21st-22nd 2008, which
is in two weeks' time. Has that pla
> I think, and this is just my opinion, that if you are forced to do a
> linear search through the entire test suite in order to find the file
> you want, that perhaps the test suite needs a tad better organisation.
Perhaps. However, if the linear search is then replaced with a recursive
one, no
> Can anyone give me an idea as to where the function uname is located in
> os?
This question is out-of-scope for python-dev; please use python-list
instead when asking how something is currently implemented.
However, there is an easy answer, so I'll give it anyway: it's
implemented in Modules/po
> Personally I'd like to see packages have their own test directory.
That's a good idea, and it is already implemented for several packages.
> This
> keeps things related to each other together. Top level modules of
> course would have their tests in the top level test directory as they
> are no
14 matches
Mail list logo
