""Martin v. Löwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> At the global level, the subversion does not work:
|
| I think you are misinterpreting what you are seeing.
No, you didn't understand the code I posted which explicitely demonstrated
the same point you repeated.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Would it be ok if I committed the changes? Neal, do you want to
>> commit the changes if I post an updated patch with a blurb for the
>> NE
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would it be ok if I committed the changes? Neal, do you want to
> commit the changes if I post an updated patch with a blurb for the
> NEWS file?
You are the asyncore maintainer, correct? I believe it's pretty much
up t
As we approach the 2.6 beta date, and after getting my updated public
key pushed to the python.org servers, I would really like to get the
asyncore/asynchat patch (with documentation) committed. Previously,
we were waiting on documentation, which the last patch had, but which
was > 80 columns. Th
> The question is, what is the specification for Python.
Now, that's a more interesting question than the question originally
asked (which I interpreted as "why does it work the way it works").
The only indication in the specification of that feature I could find
was:
http://docs.python.org/dev/
> At the global level, the subversion does not work:
I think you are misinterpreting what you are seeing. When you refer to
the global identifier None, the compiler just knows that it must be
the NoneType singleton, and returns it as a constant, without doing any
name lookup. So it isn't that assi
"Tony Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| At 4:46 PM +0100 6/9/08, Michael Foord wrote:
| Or perhaps CPython should just stop trying to detect this at compile
time.
| Note that while assignment to ".None" is not allowed, setattr(foo,
"None",
| 1) then referenci
On Jun 9, 2008, at 17:12, Alex Martelli wrote:
The problem is more general: what if a member (of some external
object we're proxying one way or another) is named print (in Python <
3), or class, or...? To allow foo.print or bar.class would require
pretty big changes to Python's parser
I simp
If you want a short path name, you should use win32api.GetShortPathName().
Attempting to compute it yourself isn’t as straight forward as you think.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hartwell Bryan
Sent: 27 May 2008 08:00
To: python-dev@python.org
Subject: [Python-De
Tony Nelson wrote:
At 4:46 PM +0100 6/9/08, Michael Foord wrote:
Alex Martelli wrote:
The problem is more general: what if a member (of some external
object we're proxying one way or another) is named print (in Python <
3), or class, or...? To allow foo.print or bar.class would requir
At 4:46 PM +0100 6/9/08, Michael Foord wrote:
>Alex Martelli wrote:
>> The problem is more general: what if a member (of some external
>> object we're proxying one way or another) is named print (in Python <
>> 3), or class, or...? To allow foo.print or bar.class would require
>> pretty big chang
Alex Martelli wrote:
The problem is more general: what if a member (of some external
object we're proxying one way or another) is named print (in Python <
3), or class, or...? To allow foo.print or bar.class would require
pretty big changes to Python's parser -- I have vague memories that
the i
The problem is more general: what if a member (of some external
object we're proxying one way or another) is named print (in Python <
3), or class, or...? To allow foo.print or bar.class would require
pretty big changes to Python's parser -- I have vague memories that
the issue was discussed ages
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I haven't looked at that code recently, but I believe the ADSL
sequence in the assignment node is for statements where there are
actually multiple assignment targets, such as:
>>> p = x, y = 1, 2
>>> p, x, y
((1, 2), 1, 2)
Cheers,
Nick.
Ah I see. A quick test verifies
Thomas Lee wrote:
In porting one of the old peephole optimizations to the new AST compiler
I noticed something weird going on with the following code:
a, b, c = 1, 2, 3
Now, as you would expect this gets parsed into an Assign node. That
Assign node looks like the following:
Assign.targets =
In porting one of the old peephole optimizations to the new AST compiler
I noticed something weird going on with the following code:
a, b, c = 1, 2, 3
Now, as you would expect this gets parsed into an Assign node. That
Assign node looks like the following:
Assign.targets = [Tuple(Name(a), Na
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format -
> given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
If you want to email what you have done to [EMAIL PROTECTED], we'd love to help!
--
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see the imposing list of 16 release blockers. [1] Luckily, most
of the issues have patches that just need *your* review. Others,
namely the Py3k exception issues, may require a little more
discussio
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
On Jun 8, 2008, at 7:38 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
As we approach the planned first betas for 2.6/3.0, my heart sinks
when I see th
On 2008-06-09 07:20, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:19 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-06-03 01:29, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I will freely admit that I haven't followed this thr
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:24:55 pm Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
So, it's okay to setattr the attribute name "None" but not okay to
set it directly?
I suspect this is off-topic for python-dev, and would be better on
comp.lang.python or similar, but for what it's worth,
21 matches
Mail list logo
