Currently, multiprocessing cannot be imported:
>>> import multiprocessing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/home/gbr/devel/python/Lib/multiprocessing/__init__.py", line 63, in
import _multiprocessing
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'BufferTooSh
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ~/Projects/python/trunk/python
> Python 2.6a3+ (trunk:63964, Jun 5 2008, 16:49:12)
> [GCC 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" fo
Hi Guido,
glad to hear you're recovering.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> anything someone really needs me to look at ASAP (e.g. a BDFL decision
> affecting the impending beta release) please send me an email
This seems to require a BDFL decision:
http://bugs.python.org/issue2997
Executive Summary:
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
What do you think about this code:
class A:
locals()[42] = 98
Seems people rely on it working. Do we consider it part of python
language?
Modifying the dict returned by locals() is documented
as NOT being guaranteed to work, isn't it?
--
Greg
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:44 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-09 07:20, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:19 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On 2008-06-03 01:29, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Guido v
I don't see it the same way; this is a terribly unimportant API, so
let's not mess with it. threading.py is worth fixing (a) because it's
so popular, and (b) because some folks insisted that the new
multiprocessing module have an API that is as similar as possible to
threading. IOW The general mora
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see no reason to invent a new custom dict to prevent people from
> doing something they find to be useful. If you can't segfault with it,
> who cares.
Don't worry; I'm not suggesting it.
--
Cheers,
Benjamin Pete
What do you think about this code:
class A:
locals()[42] = 98
Seems people rely on it working. Do we consider it part of python
language? (Note that you cannot do the same with getattr/setattr which
checks if argument is a string)
Seems like a bug to me, but I don't think there is much we ca
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Scott Dial
>>
>> I apologize for my ignorance, but who? Could you please cite something
>> reputable that relies on this detail?
>>
>
> It's in tests of sqlalchemy. My question is among
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Scott Dial
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> What do you think about this code:
>>
>> class A:
>> locals()[42] = 98
>>
>> Seems people rely on it working.
>
> I apologize for my ignorance, but who? Could you please cite something
> reput
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
What do you think about this code:
class A:
locals()[42] = 98
Seems people rely on it working.
I apologize for my ignorance, but who? Could you please cite something
reputable that relies on this detail?
--
Scott Dial
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you think about this code:
class A:
locals()[42] = 98
Seems people rely on it working. Do we consider it part of python
language? (Note that you cannot do the same with getattr/set
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think about this code:
>
> class A:
> locals()[42] = 98
>
> Seems people rely on it working. Do we consider it part of python
> language? (Note that you cannot do the same with getattr/setattr which
> che
What do you think about this code:
class A:
locals()[42] = 98
Seems people rely on it working. Do we consider it part of python
language? (Note that you cannot do the same with getattr/setattr which
checks if argument is a string)
Cheers,
fijal
___
All,
I've been sick since Saturday and still don't feel up to much. I've
collected a severe email backlog going back to June 6th. If there's
anything someone really needs me to look at ASAP (e.g. a BDFL decision
affecting the impending beta release) please send me an email (a
followup to this thre
I'll try to roll an updated patch with the review info tonight for you
On Jun 10, 2008, at 7:26 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>> For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest format
>> - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking lon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 9, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
For the multiprocessing module all I have left is the docs in rest
format - given I'm a rest newbie, it's taking longer than I thought
It's okay if docs don't make it into the beta. That's the kind
I've uploaded the first "rolled up" patch against trunk for PEP 371's
implementation. This includes docs, tests, module, the works.
The only outstanding issues with this are:
* Had to comment out several unit tests due to threading._Event and
multiprocessing Event API differences.
* One test fail
I spent a bit of time trying to figure out what's going on here
(was getting errors regarding missing uintptr_t while trying to compile
an external module with Python 2.4).
pyport.h now includes stdint.h but can we fix up this in Python.h?
/* For uintptr_t, intptr_t */
#ifdef HAVE_STDDEF_H
#includ
Thomas Lee schrieb:
What happened in 3k? Were the constants in xmlrpclib renamed/removed?
They were removed, as there is no way they can be accessed as attributes of a
module now.
Georg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.
Originally Python exceptions had no __unicode__ method. In Python 2.5
__unicode__ was added. This led to "unicode(Exception)" failing and so
the addition of __unicode__ was reverted [1].
This leaves Python 2.6 in a position where calls to
"unicode(Exception(u'\xe1'))" fail as they are equivalent t
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ~/Projects/python/trunk/python
Python 2.6a3+ (trunk:63964, Jun 5 2008, 16:49:12)
[GCC 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import struct
>>> struct.pack("357913941c", 'a')
Seg
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Giampaolo Rodola' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10 Giu, 07:01, "Josiah Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
The question is, what is the specification for Python.
Now, that's a more interesting question than the question originally
asked (which I interpreted as "why does it work the way it works").
The only indication in the specification of that feature I could find
was:
On 10 Giu, 07:01, "Josiah Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Would it be ok if I committed the changes? Neal, do you want to
> >>
I'm working on it now. I'll do my best to have a fix by the time I go
to work this morning.
- Josiah
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I don't want to be picky, but it seem
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't want to be picky, but it seems the commit broke the tests:
>>
>> test test_asyncore failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/tmp/python-test/local/lib/python2.6/test/test_asyncore.py", line
>> 387, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 10, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Josiah Carlson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be ok if I committed the changes? Neal, do you want to
commit the changes if I post an up
Josiah Carlson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be ok if I committed the changes? Neal, do you want to
commit the changes if I post an updated patch with a blur
Thomas Lee wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
I haven't looked at that code recently, but I believe the ADSL
sequence in the assignment node is for statements where there are
actually multiple assignment targets, such as:
>>> p = x, y = 1, 2
>>> p, x, y
((1, 2), 1, 2)
Cheers,
Nick.
Ah I see. A q
32 matches
Mail list logo
