On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks to me like the main thing that Pybots needs is help with
> maintenance. Getting someone to set up an individual buildbot is one thing,
> but keeping it working is the important bit and it looks like people are not
> doing that
On 6 Jul, 09:09 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:46 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's one thing to tell people that they need to be helping out (and
I'm sure you're right) but it's much more useful to get the message
out that
"we really need people to do X, Y, and Z".
On 6 Jul, 05:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I'd also like to improve the labels of the build slaves. What
exactly
is "x86 Red Hat 9 trunk" testing? Trunk of what? What project?)
It seems like you would like to edit the master configuration file.
That can be arranged fairly easily.
How s
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> Does anyone have a clue about why this test fails only on this
> platform? The test is question is verifying that URLError gets
> raised. From the traceback, it appears that there is an uncaught
> exception (URLError) but it fails in an assertRaises() check for
> URLError.
Does anyone have a clue about why this test fails only on this
platform? The test is question is verifying that URLError gets
raised. From the traceback, it appears that there is an uncaught
exception (URLError) but it fails in an assertRaises() check for
URLError. That doesn't make much sense u
Hi and thanks for your answers,
> If you are able to offer something that's not on the list, that'd be
> good. But any help at all is appreciated.
>
> I believe Windows has traditionally been under-represented in all
> buildbot farms, and it's likely to stay that way...
Well what I could provide
