This doesn't need to be an interpreter thing; it's easy to implement
by the user (I've done it about a dozen times using a single global
flag). If you want it to be automatic, it's even possible to make it
happen automatically using sys.settrace() and friends (you can even
make it reasonably fast
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Some effort needs to be
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Some effort needs to be made to clear the standard library of -3
>>> warnings.
>>> Running -3 on productio
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (07/04/08 - 07/11/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
1967 open (+43) / 13199 closed (+17) / 15166 total (+60)
Open issues with patches: 621
Average
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
Yes, indeed. We should make sure, however, that the changes in the 2.6
libraries are the absolute minimum to get the job done. (I'm trying to
pretend like this isn't violat
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> Yes, indeed. We should make sure, however, that the changes in the 2.6
>> libraries are the absolute minimum to get the job done. (I'm trying to
>> pretend like this isn't violating the prohibi
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some effort needs to be made to clear the standard library of -3 warnings.
Running -3 on production code usually involves exercising library code so
the useful result is obscured by Python com
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some effort needs to be made to clear the standard library of -3 warnings.
> Running -3 on production code usually involves exercising library code so
> the useful result is obscured by Python complaining about itself.
[OK so a newbie post here so many apologies if I am doing this wrong]
Quick Synopsis:
A child thread in an executing Python program can not safely shutdown the
program. The issue URL is: http://bugs.python.org/issue502236
So my proposal is:
Example:
We have three threads -
t0 -
Some effort needs to be made to clear the standard library of -3 warnings. Running -3 on production code usually involves
exercising library code so the useful result is obscured by Python complaining about itself. Since that use case involves the users
own tests, I don't think the effort needs
From: "Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does anyone have time to review the patch
http://bugs.python.org/file10876/hex_float5.patch
for issue 3008 (float <-> hexadecimal string conversion):
I'll look at it today and tomorrow.
Raymond
___
Python
Does anyone have time to review the patch
http://bugs.python.org/file10876/hex_float5.patch
for issue 3008 (float <-> hexadecimal string conversion):
http://bugs.python.org/issue3008
? It would be really good if this could go in before next week's
beta. Guido's approved the idea in principle, b
12 matches
Mail list logo
