Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon 2009 Call for Proposals

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Call for proposals -- PyCon 2009 -- >>> ==

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Reminder: Python 2.6 final next Wednesday

Barry Warsaw wrote: > This is a reminder that Python 2.6 final is schedule for release next > Wednesday, October 1st. > > Once again, I've gone through the release blocker issues and knocked > anything that doesn't specifically affect 2.6 to deferred blocker. This > leaves us with 7 open blockin

Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon 2009 Call for Proposals

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Call for proposals -- PyCon 2009 -- >> === >> >> Want to share your

Re: [Python-Dev] PyCon 2009 Call for Proposals

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Call for proposals -- PyCon 2009 -- > === > > Want to share your experience and expertise? PyCon 2009 is looking for > proposals to fill the for

[Python-Dev] call for help: C-API 2 to 3 porting guide

Hi guys, I remember a while back we were bemoaning the fact that little documentation exists for the extension module transition between 2.x and 3.x. In the name of this effort, I've created a c porting howto (Doc/howto/cporting.rst). I have started a few sections, but I can't do it all alone. Plea

[Python-Dev] PyCon 2009 Call for Proposals

Call for proposals -- PyCon 2009 -- === Want to share your experience and expertise? PyCon 2009 is looking for proposals to fill the formal presentation tracks. The PyCon conference days will be March 27-29, 20

[Python-Dev] Reminder: Python 2.6 final next Wednesday

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a reminder that Python 2.6 final is schedule for release next Wednesday, October 1st. Once again, I've gone through the release blocker issues and knocked anything that doesn't specifically affect 2.6 to deferred blocker. This leaves

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of MS Windows CE port

>> Please don't. Whether or not _UNICODE is defined should have no effect. > > Well, currently it does make a difference. Simple example: CreateFile(). It's not so simple: Python doesn't actually call CreateFile, AFAICT (well, it does, in _msi.c, but I hope you aren't worried about that module on

[Python-Dev] preliminary findings of compiling python to javascript and running it under google "V8"

http://groups.google.com/group/pyjamas-dev/browse_thread/thread/5e14ac70508112e5/53ca0b8190f35e21?hl=en#53ca0b8190f35e21 may be of interest to some people. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-d

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

ACTIVITY SUMMARY (09/19/08 - 09/26/08) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue number. Do NOT respond to this message. 2052 open (+35) / 13746 closed (+32) / 15798 total (+67) Open issues with patches: 660 Average

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of MS Windows CE port

On Thursday 25 September 2008, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > 1. TCHAR is always WCHAR > > Python shouldn't be using TCHAR at all; that getpathp uses it is > misguided (IMO). It already does, see below... > > The first point is interesting to the desktop win32 variants because > > everything since NT