On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Victor Stinner schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to be able to catch SIGSEGV in my Python code! So I started to
>> hack Python trunk to support this feature. The idea is to use a signal
>> handler which call longjmp(), and
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:26:30 pm Nick Coghlan wrote:
> (Tangent: the above two try/except examples are perfectly legal Py3k
> code. Do we really need the "pass" statement anymore?)
I can't imagine why you would think we don't need the pass statement. I
often use it:
* For subclassing exceptions:
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Vitor Bosshard wrote:
>> The exact same argument could be used for list comprehensions themselves.
> No, an LC saves more than newlines -- it saves the code
> to set up and append to a list. This is a substantial
> improvement when this code would otherwise swamp the
> essential
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
>
> Beats me. Are that many projects crazy enough to have that many active
> branches?
Any project using branch-driven development has many active branches. Our
specificity is that we must maintain in sync two branches (trunk, py3k) which
have widely diverged fro
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 12:14:43AM +0200, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Do other subscribed people receive these commit messages?
> Is there a problem with the mailer, or some SVN trigger?
It looks like mail from dinsdale.python.org to mail.python.org isn't
working due to a DNS issue:
rcpt to: [E
Brett Cannon wrote:
Christian rightly points out that with four active trees, we're going to a
pretty big challenge on our hands. How do other large open source projects
handle similar situations?
Beats me. Are that many projects crazy enough to have that many active branches?
Is it really
Vitor Bosshard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Essentially, all that saves is a newline
or two, which, as I think has been generally accepted, tends to hurt
readability.
The exact same argument could be used for list comprehensions themselves.
No, an LC saves m
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>> So now that we've released 2.6 and are working hard on shepherding 3.0
>> out the door, it's time to worry about th
Module globals are also reset when the module *object* is
garbage-collected (e.g. it's removed from sys.modules and not
referenced elsewhere), but the module *dict* is still referenced. This
can happen if all uses of the module is of the form "from
import " where the is a class or function, and
a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
So now that we've released 2.6 and are working hard on shepherding 3.0
out the door, it's time to worry about the next set of releases. :)
I propose that we dramatically shorten our release cycle
I've noticed an error that comes up from time to time in python 3.0 buildbots.
The error is always similar to this one:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"E:\cygwin\home\db3l\buildarea\3.0.bolen-windows\build\lib\test\test_io.py",
line 900, in testBasicIO
self.assertEquals(f.write("ab
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer!
> I don't buy the argument that newlines automagically improves readability
> though. You also get increased nesting suggesting something interesting is
> happening where it isn't and that hurts re
Hello,
I consult very regularly (100x a day) the python-checkins and
python-300-checkins mailing list archives:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-October/date.html#end
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000-checkins/2008-October/date.html#end
But they did not receive the
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
I propose that we dramatically shorten our release cycle for 2.7/3.1
to roughly a year and put a strong focus stabilizing all the new
goodies we included in the last release(s). In the 3.x branch, we
should continue to solidify the new code and features that were
introduc
So now that we've released 2.6 and are working hard on shepherding 3.0
out the door, it's time to worry about the next set of releases. :)
I propose that we dramatically shorten our release cycle for 2.7/3.1
to roughly a year and put a strong focus stabilizing all the new
goodies we included in th
- Mensaje original
> De: Leif Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Para: Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: python-dev@python.org
> Enviado: viernes, 3 de octubre, 2008 10:29:33
> Asunto: Re: [Python-Dev] if-syntax for regular for-loops
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Andreas Nilsson
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (09/26/08 - 10/03/08)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2074 open (+39) / 13779 closed (+16) / 15853 total (+55)
Open issues with patches: 678
Average
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With that out of the way, on to todays subject:
> I use list comprehensions and generator expressions a lot and lately I've
> found myself writing a lot of code like this:
>
> for i in items if i.some_field == some_value:
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> First post so here it goes.
> My name is Adde, and I'm a Swedish software developer. I've been programming
> for about 23 years now since starting with Basic on the C64. I've been
> through most well kno
Hi.
First post so here it goes.
My name is Adde, and I'm a Swedish software developer. I've been
programming for about 23 years now since starting with Basic on the
C64. I've been through most well known and a couple of lesser known
languages in search of the perfect one. At the moment I'm w
20 matches
Mail list logo
