On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
>
> Now will I'll start verifying, adding tests, updating or closing as
> needed the recently changed old issues, until I've taken a good look
> at these. Then, if there's still time left before Saturday, I'll focus
> on verifying/flaggi
Jim Baker wrote:
+1 on the cleanup: reading the bug description of
http://bugs.python.org/issue1533164, this will also help Jython. Now I
know why we see scenarios of package with setup.cfg with optimize=1:
Indeed, this is a well-known issue. Many packages put an "optimize=1" in
their setup.cf
+1 on the cleanup: reading the bug description of
http://bugs.python.org/issue1533164, this will also help Jython. Now I know
why we see scenarios of package with setup.cfg with optimize=1:
Indeed, this is a well-known issue. Many packages put an "optimize=1" in
their setup.cfg in order to solve i
One more thing: There's a mailing list specifically for help with C
extensions, c...@python.org
--
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote
programs, then the first woodpecker that c
2009/2/11 Daniel (ajax) Diniz
> Hi,
>
> Here's a status report about the digging. Thanks Benjamin, Antoine,
> Martin, Raymond, Guilherme, Georg, Brett, Mark and everyone else for
> helping :)
>
> Good:
> Many requested assignments:
>Thanks everyone that asked for bugs. If anyone else wants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A quick reminder that I am planning to release Python 3.0.1 this
Friday, February 13. Thanks to y'all's hard work, we have no
showstopper bugs at the moment. The 3.0 buildbots look mostly clean
and green.
If we can keep it this way for about
[Daniel (ajax) Diniz]
Now will I'll start verifying, adding tests, updating or closing as
needed the recently changed old issues, until I've taken a good look
at these. Then, if there's still time left before Saturday, I'll focus
on verifying/flagging more ancient ones.
Thanks for your effort
Hi,
Here's a status report about the digging. Thanks Benjamin, Antoine,
Martin, Raymond, Guilherme, Georg, Brett, Mark and everyone else for
helping :)
Good:
Many requested assignments:
Thanks everyone that asked for bugs. If anyone else wants more,
just let me know :)
Old issues closed
Sushant Sinha wrote:
> I am running Python 2.5.4 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 4.3.2-r2 p1.5,
> pie-10.1.5) 4.3.2
>
> My program uses python interface to two C modules namely libnids
> (pynids) and adns (adns-python). My program is written all in python.
> When I run my program it aborts.
As Martin s
> So I am not sure where the error is. Any clue on where the bug possibly
> may be: adns-python, pynids or python? Or how I should I go about
> debugging this?
This is out of scope for python-dev, but I give some clues anyway:
- try finding out what kind of object is being released. Is it a good
> At least IA32 and AMD64 have specific addressing modes where
> it's possibile to use a multiplying factor of 1, 2, 4 or 8 for the
> index register.
>
> I hope that compilers were smart enough to already used them.
For x86, certainly (at least GCC does). For Thumb, certainly not:
the compiler ca
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>> - efficient array indexing: they give shift-and-index back to
>> Thumb mode, for a shift by 2, allowing to index arrays with
>> 4-byte elements in a single instruction (rather than requiring
>> a separate multipy-by-four). Again
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Mitchell L Model wrote:
> I have a patch for IDLE, but I've never submitted a patch before and not
> quite sure of the procedure, despite reading the guidelines at
> http://www.python.org/dev/patches/. But I'll be brave and persevere. The
> question I have at the m
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:24 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:16:48PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> I ran 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 manually. 2.7 should get picked up on the
>> next run. The problem is that regrtest.py -R hangs from time to time
>> which caused the machine to run ou
I am running Python 2.5.4 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 4.3.2-r2 p1.5,
pie-10.1.5) 4.3.2
My program uses python interface to two C modules namely libnids (pynids)
and adns (adns-python). My program is written all in python. When I run my
program it aborts. Here is the stack when that happens:
#0 0x0
I have a patch for IDLE, but I've never submitted a patch before and
not quite sure of the procedure, despite reading the guidelines at
http://www.python.org/dev/patches/. But I'll be brave and persevere.
The question I have at the moment is should I only submit the patch
vs. 3.1 or also for 3.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:16:48PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I ran 2.6, 3.0, and 3.1 manually. 2.7 should get picked up on the
> next run. The problem is that regrtest.py -R hangs from time to time
> which caused the machine to run out of memory. Does anyone else have
> regrtest.py -R hang fo
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>> - efficient array indexing: they give shift-and-index back to
>> Thumb mode, for a shift by 2, allowing to index arrays with
>> 4-byte elements in a single instruction (rather than requiring
>> a separate multipy-by-four). Aga
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
> - efficient array indexing: they give shift-and-index back to
> Thumb mode, for a shift by 2, allowing to index arrays with
> 4-byte elements in a single instruction (rather than requiring
> a separate multipy-by-four). Again useful for JIT of array
>
Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
> It's not useful for CPython, since it's based on a loop which evaluates a
> bytecode
> at the time.
>
> You have to rewrite the virtual machine implementing a JIT compiler that
> generates Thumb-EE instructions. But it's a big effort, since ceval.c works
> in a
> complet
On Feb, 11 2009 at 04:11:AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 18:45, Benjamin Schwartz
>> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>> According to ARM [4]:
>>>
>>> """Jazelle RCT can be used to significantly reduce the code bloat
>>> associated
>>> with AOT and JIT compilatio
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Stephen Thorne wrote:
> On 2009-02-10, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Daniel (ajax) Diniz
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If anyone is interested in being added as nosy for any category of
>> > bugs, let me know and I'll do that as I scan the trac
22 matches
Mail list logo
