Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
> Status report and roadmap to be posted later today, before date +%s
> turns 1234567890 :)
Missed that and got almost no tracker work done. Postponed to Monday,
after some weekend cleaning.
Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Hi Martin,
Sorry about being so brief, I got a lot of unexpected interruptions
and was rushing things.
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> For starters, free form searches, aggregation and filtering of
>> results.
>
> What is "free form searches" (example)? What is aggregation?
> What results do you want
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the
> availability of Python 3.0.1, the first bug fix release of Python 3.0.
> Version 3.0.1 fixes dozens of bugs reported si
>So what are the expected efforts for 3.1?
>- io-in-C
>- import-in-Python
>- ... anything else?
A fixed "email" module.
--
Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft
http://www.object-craft.com.au/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.or
Benjamin Peterson python.org> writes:
>
> Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in
> expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our
> efforts on 3.1?
Focusing on 3.1 should be ok.
So what are the expected efforts for 3.1?
- io-in-C
- import-in-Python
- ..
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:35, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>>
>> Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in
>> expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our
>> efforts on 3.1?
>
> I almost said "of course
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:35, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in
> expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our
> efforts on 3.1?
>
I almost said "of course we are", but then I realized that 3.1 is going to
be very simila
Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in
expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our
efforts on 3.1?
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm happy to announce the
availability of Python 3.0.1, the first bug fix release of Python
3.0. Version 3.0.1 fixes dozens of bugs reported since the release of
Python 3.0 on December 3rd, 2008.
Pyth
Brett Cannon wrote:
Is there a Python connection I'm missing?
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-satellite-collision15-2009feb15,0,7901281.story
Well, the front page of python.org does say "NASA uses Python"...
Also it sounds like they could do with a really good
garbage collect
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
This smells like a bug that brings issubclass() out of sync with
isinstance().
No, it affects both isinstance() and issubclass().
They both raise a TypeError if the purported class
object doesn't have a __bases__ attribute that is
a tuple.
This isn't necessarily wrong
Is there a Python connection I'm missing?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 13:12, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-satellite-collision15-2009feb15,0,7901281.story
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> h
[Greg Ewing]
I've discovered something slightly misleading in the docs
for PyObject_IsInstance:
When testing if B is a subclass of A, if A is B, PyObject_IsSubclass
returns true. If A and B are different objects, B‘s __bases__
attribute is searched...
This suggests that issubclass(A, A)
I've discovered something slightly misleading in the docs
for PyObject_IsInstance:
When testing if B is a subclass of A, if A is B, PyObject_IsSubclass
returns true. If A and B are different objects, B‘s __bases__
attribute is searched...
This suggests that issubclass(A, A) will always be
> Mark, the patch is not trivial, I cannot spend time on this until this
> is accepted. Hope you understand.
I certainly do understand. So it's likely not going to happen.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.pyt
> Send emails before they were done :D
Again: what's that?
> Use a VCS for in-progress activities
Hmm. Why do you need a database copy for that?
> Figure out how to serialize and submit the work done locally
Again, don't understand. too brief.
> Share results with interested parties off-t
> For starters, free form searches, aggregation and filtering of
> results.
What is "free form searches" (example)? What is aggregation?
What results do you want to filter? (roundup can already filter
results quite well)
> The web interface is pretty good for handling individual
> issues, but not
I discovered today that Python 2's prohibition against performing
readlines on a file being iterated over appears to have been lifted
in Python 3. Is this intentional? If it is, should it be added to the
What's New in the documentation? I haven't been able to find anything
mentioning the change
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_Syndrome
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-satellite-collision15-2009feb15,0,7901281.story
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.o
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-satellite-collision15-2009feb15,0,7901281.story
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-de
Steve Holden wrote:
> Can I just say (without in any way wanting to get involved in what might
> be considered as "work") that it's encouraging the tracker received a
> bit more TLC we might eventually be able to see at least the occasional
> week where the issue count increment was negative :)
Th
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 16:45, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
>> I have to test my patch against a good
>> representation of the issue, regression tests must pass, 'automated
>> test needed' fits well :)
>
> Go with "Unit test needed" so it's short and to the point and you have a
Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:
> "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> I think HTML scraping is a really bad idea. What is it that you
>> specifically want to do with these data?
>
> For starters, free form searches, aggregation and filtering of
> results. The web interface is pretty good for handling individual
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (02/06/09 - 02/13/09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2352 open (+56) / 14720 closed (+22) / 17072 total (+78)
Open issues with patches: 803
Average
Done, http://bugs.python.org/issue5248
Mark, the patch is not trivial, I cannot spend time on this until this
is accepted. Hope you understand.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>> I would like to propose the inclusi
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
> I would like to propose the inclusion of a new T_SIZET in structmember.h
> in order to suport 'size_t' struct fields with PyMemberDef. Would such
> addition be accepted for 2.7 and 3.1?
Please open a feature request at bugs.python.org, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The email package needs a lot of love, especially for Python 3.0. I'm
already signed up for two sprints for Pycon, but if there's enough
interest I would try at least to find some time to talk with others
about improving the email package.
Th
Daniel (ajax) Diniz schrieb:
> Over-spammig:
> Sorry, Georg! I only noticed all issues in the Documentation
> component are auto-assigned to you today. This meant dozens of unasked
> for assignments :-/
That's okay, I'll go through them at the weekend and just unassign what
I won't manage to do
28 matches
Mail list logo
