On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:46:11 -0400, James Y Knight wrote:
> Uh guys, I'm not sure if anyone here noticed, but Debian and Ubuntu
> have switched to install their distribution-supplied python libraries
> into:
> /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/lib/dist-packages
> and distutils by default will install into
>
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:38 PM, David Lyon wrote:
When I go into python on ubuntu I see there is /usr/local/pythonX.X/
lib/
site-packages and I'm wondering why the hubba setuptools/distutils
doesn't put packages there by default. That would solve a lot of
problems.
Just leave /usr/lib/pythonX.X//l
--- On Wed, 7/22/09, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> From: Oleg Broytmann
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] expy: an expressway to extend Python
> To: python-dev@python.org
> Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 12:45 AM
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:26:52PM
> -0400, Eric Entin wrote:
> > I think the point of his
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:41:41 -0400, Tres Seaver
wrote:
>>> The main problem imho has been that easy_install by default
>>> has installed to /usr/lib/pythonX.X/site-packages when in
>>> fact that really is an operating system controlled directory.
>>>
>>> So naughty naughty to setuptools
..
> T
Curt Hagenlocher:
> Ah, you're right -- the PGO bits probably need VS Pro. The 64-bit
> compilers should be in the Windows SDK, but it wouldn't surprise me if
> they were not included in Express.
64-bit isn't in Express and merging the 64 bit compiler from the
SDK into Express may be possible
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> Some features like PGO aren't available in VS Express Edition or Windows
> SDK. I'm not sure about all aspects of X86_64 builds, too. I'm prefer
> better safe than sorry.
Ah, you're right -- the PGO bits probably need VS Pro. The 64-bit
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>> Devs:
>>
>> I've been in correspondence with Microsoft about the provision of
>> software, and it transpires that if you want to support Windows better
>> Microsoft will be quite liberal about licensing: they will *give* you a
>> Microsoft Developer
Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
> Considering that the compilers are all freely downloadable as part of
> the Windows SDK, it would be weird if the subscription were *more*
> restrictive than what you can get without it.
>
> Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft, but eh, I'm just guessing.
Some features like
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> Does the MSDN subscription also include the permission to create and
> release binaries? Sam Ramji wrote just "developing and testing". Me and
> probably all other subscribers like to use the MSDN subscription to
> build Windows binaries
Steve Holden wrote:
> Devs:
>
> I've been in correspondence with Microsoft about the provision of
> software, and it transpires that if you want to support Windows better
> Microsoft will be quite liberal about licensing: they will *give* you a
> Microsoft Developer Network license.
>
> If you ar
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:26:52PM -0400, Eric Entin wrote:
> I think the point of his software is to make it easier to interface Python
> with C code
I think I understand that. And I think this
> > > @function(double) #return type: double
> > > def sqrt(x=double): #argument x: double
is h
I think the point of his software is to make it easier to interface Python
with C code, although his examples were probably not the best.
Eric Entin
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Oleg Broytmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:22:19AM -0700, Yingjie Lan wrote:
> > @function(double) #return
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:22:19AM -0700, Yingjie Lan wrote:
> @function(double) #return type: double
> def sqrt(x=double): #argument x: double
Python 3.0 has arguments and return value annotations:
http://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html#new-syntax
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3107
Devs:
I've been in correspondence with Microsoft about the provision of
software, and it transpires that if you want to support Windows better
Microsoft will be quite liberal about licensing: they will *give* you a
Microsoft Developer Network license.
If you are interested in offering better Wind
Hi,
Here is a brief example on how to use expy to implement the math module:
(for more details, see http://expy.sf.net/)
"""Python math module by expy-cxpy."""
from expy import *
expymodule(__name__)
#includes, defines, etc.
@prologue
def myprolog():
return """
#include
"""
@function(d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Szakmeister wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, David Lyon wrote:
> [snip]
>> The main problem imho has been that easy_install by default
>> has installed to /usr/lib/pythonX.X/site-packages when in
>> fact that really is an operating system
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, David Lyon wrote:
[snip]
> The main problem imho has been that easy_install by default
> has installed to /usr/lib/pythonX.X/site-packages when in
> fact that really is an operating system controlled directory.
>
> So naughty naughty to setuptools
I've witnesse
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 09:19:10PM -0700, Yingjie Lan wrote:
> This is to announce the initial release of expy 0.1.0.
> More details at http://expy.sourceforge.net/
What is it (the announcement is too brief and I'm not going to click on
a link without a real need)? How does it help core develop
18 matches
Mail list logo
