>> When I (or somebody else) contacts all the slave operators and asks them
>> to restart the buildbot slaves.
>
> Does this mean you're taking responsibility for this task? Or are you
> looking for a volunteer?
I had been running this buildbot installation ever since I created it,
and will happ
On 24 Sep, 11:27 pm, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Additionally, I'm very apprehensive about doing any kind of release
without the buildbots running. Does anyone know when they might be
up?
When I (or somebody else) contacts all the slave operators and asks
them
to restart the buildbot slaves.
>> Additionally, I'm very apprehensive about doing any kind of release
>> without the buildbots running. Does anyone know when they might be up?
When I (or somebody else) contacts all the slave operators and asks them
to restart the buildbot slaves.
Regards,
Martin
___
> Do we already have the machines? or do they need to be acquired?
Yes, the machines are all there, see
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
R. David Murray bitdance.com> writes:
>
> And if Snakebite isn't enough I
> have a well-connected platform I could run Linux buildbots on in
> vserver virthosts, and a less-well-connected platform that could run
> KVM based stuff.
I suppose Snakebite will be enough, but only once it is ready :)
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 at 13:49, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:23:31 -0400, David Lyon a ??crit??:
Depends on where the machines are. There are good tools do check all
automatically. Nagios is one.
Anyway, this would suite my work schedule for the next 12 months.
Do we already hav
Le Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:23:31 -0400, David Lyon a écrit :
>
> Depends on where the machines are. There are good tools do check all
> automatically. Nagios is one.
>
> Anyway, this would suite my work schedule for the next 12 months.
>
> Do we already have the machines? or do they need to be acqui
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 at 12:07, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Dino Viehland wrote:
We are going to start contributing tests back real soon now. I'm not sure
that these are the best tests to contribute as they require a version of
Python to compare ag
P.J. Eby telecommunity.com> writes:
>
> I doubt that it was intentional on Tarek's part (checking the thread
> shows that Antoine's the one who first cut the cc: list), but the
> fact remains that I hadn't seen it when I sent my
> message.
Just FYI, there are two reasons that I cut the CC lis
David Lyon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:49:16 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
>
>> While it's a good idea to put up some form of meta-data
>> into an index, I wonder why you are using setup.cfg
>> for this.
>>
>> setup.cfg has traditionally been used to configure distutils,
>> not to define meta
10 matches
Mail list logo
