Michael Foord wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/10/5 Nick Coghlan :
So I would agree that method invocation on literals (particularly string
literals) is an already established language idiom.
And who hasn't ever used 4.56.as_integer_ratio()? :)
>
I've tried 4.__add__ a few times
Vinay Sajip yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Perhaps TypeError, too.
Sorry, brainfade there. I already mentioned TypeError in the original post :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscr
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> Since part of the purpose of this new configuration option is to allow
> other projects to use it as a target for specifying a logging
> configuration, maintaining it as a formal PEP seems like a good idea to
> me. This is already done for a few other standard-is
Hello,
It turns out (*) that even in py3k, not all modules are PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN.
Should we try to remedy that, and make PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN the default in future
3.x versions?
As far I know, there's no reason not to be PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN, except for having
to convert old code.
(*) http://bugs.python.
Vinay Sajip wrote:
> A little while ago, I posted here a suggestion about a new way to configure
> logging, using dictionaries. This received some positive and no negative
> feedback, so I have thought some more about the details of how it might work.
> I
> present below the results of that thinki
A little while ago, I posted here a suggestion about a new way to configure
logging, using dictionaries. This received some positive and no negative
feedback, so I have thought some more about the details of how it might work. I
present below the results of that thinking, in a PEP-style format. I d
