Darren Dale wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com writes:
Do you have a better suggestion ? I was thinking about StandardVersion
but Standard
doesn't really express what we want to achieve here I think,
I think
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/12/10 Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 20:25, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Since the intent of IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL is to make doctests immune to
implementation version specific changes, it seems to me that extending its
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
[..]
No, the PEP document itself should either contain the questions and
answers, or contain a link to the discussion along with a brief summary
of what it was about and a explicit statement of its outcome.
Ok then,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Darren Dale wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com writes:
Do you have a better suggestion ? I was thinking about StandardVersion
but
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (12/04/09 - 12/11/09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2526 open (+34) / 16775 closed (+11) / 19301 total (+45)
Open issues with patches: 1007
While debugging a network algorithm in Python 2.6.2, I encountered
some strange behavior and was wondering whether it has to do with some
sort of code optimization that Python does behind the scenes.
After initialization: defaultdict(type 'set', {1: set([1])})
Popping and updating
Roy Hyunjin Han wrote:
While debugging a network algorithm in Python 2.6.2, I encountered
some strange behavior and was wondering whether it has to do with some
sort of code optimization that Python does behind the scenes.
After initialization: defaultdict(type 'set', {1:
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
Roy Hyunjin Han wrote:
While debugging a network algorithm in Python 2.6.2, I encountered
some strange behavior and was wondering whether it has to do with some
sort of code optimization that Python does behind the scenes.
After initialization:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 21:24, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2009/12/10 Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 20:25, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Since the intent of IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL is to make doctests immune to
implementation version
On 9 Dec, 06:09 pm, fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
On 09/12/2009 18:02, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
On 05:11 pm, lrege...@jarn.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 17:34, Michael Foord
fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk wrote:
Can you be more specific?
Only with an insane amount of work. I'll
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 21:36, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Certainly. Perhaps Zope would like to add something to the community
builders page.
The Zope Component Architecture would be nice to test like that. Much
of the rest of Zope needs massaging between python versions, so that
may
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
Roy Hyunjin Han wrote:
While debugging a network algorithm in Python 2.6.2, I encountered
some strange behavior and was wondering whether it has to do with some
sort of code optimization that
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 21:24, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2009/12/10 Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 20:25, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Since the intent of IGNORE_EXCEPTION_DETAIL is to make doctests immune to
Roy Hyunjin Han wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:43 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
John Arbash Meinel wrote:
y[1].update(y.pop(1))
is going to be evaluating y[1] before it evaluates y.pop(1).
Which means that it has the original set returned, which is then removed
by y.pop, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 21:36, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Certainly. Perhaps Zope would like to add something to the community
builders page.
The Zope Component Architecture would be nice to test like that. Much
15 matches
Mail list logo
