Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
>
> Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
> will that patch, which seems corre
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
[..]
>
> Furthermore, I've seen some patterns in those 5% that can be worked
> out so I'll probably be able to lower it to 3%
Done:
Total Packages : 8690
Already Match : 7645.0 (87.97%)
Have Suggestion : 768.0 (8.84%)
No Suggestion :
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>>> Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
>
> Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
> will that patch, which seems corre
At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday?
>
> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer.
Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here:
will that patch, which seems correct finally merged and get t
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (12/11/09 - 12/18/09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue
number. Do NOT respond to this message.
2552 open (+44) / 16811 closed (+18) / 19363 total (+62)
Open issues with patches: 1020
Average
