Re: [Python-Dev] interesting article on regex performance

2010-03-11 Thread Peter Portante
http://code.google.com/p/re2/ On 3/11/10 8:52 PM, "Neal Becker" wrote: > http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html > > ___ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http:/

[Python-Dev] interesting article on regex performance

2010-03-11 Thread Neal Becker
http://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Catch SIGINT at Python startup

2010-03-11 Thread Victor Stinner
Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 21:58:11, Brett Cannon a écrit : > > (...) > > Should I backport the fix to 3.1? (The backport to py3k is not done yet) > > Once you are happy with the stability then please port it to 3.1. My commit broke test_sysconfig, test_platform and test_subprocess. Some commits late

Re: [Python-Dev] Catch SIGINT at Python startup

2010-03-11 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 13:33, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2010/3/11 Brett Cannon : > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner < > victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Some news about my patch. > >> > >> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a

Re: [Python-Dev] Catch SIGINT at Python startup

2010-03-11 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2010/3/11 Brett Cannon : > > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Some news about my patch. >> >> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : >> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum >> > wrote: >> > > Actually it sounds like ther

Re: [Python-Dev] Catch SIGINT at Python startup

2010-03-11 Thread Brett Cannon
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > Some news about my patch. > > Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit : > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum > wrote: > > > Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause > > > so

Re: [Python-Dev] Bug tracker: no confirmation before deleting a message

2010-03-11 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I removed two messages by error in the bug tracker :-( Please discuss tracker issues on tracker-discuss or, better yet, file a report on the meta tracker. > The second message is msg98284, part of #7774. How can I restore it? Or can > "admin" restore it please? :-) Done. > There is an open i

[Python-Dev] Bug tracker: no confirmation before deleting a message

2010-03-11 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, I removed two messages by error in the bug tracker :-( The first message is msg100432 (first message of #8063) which has been restored by "admin". Thank you admin! The second message is msg98284, part of #7774. How can I restore it? Or can "admin" restore it please? :-) There is an open i

Re: [Python-Dev] [PEP 3148] futures - execute computations asynchronously

2010-03-11 Thread Brian Quinlan
On 10 Mar 2010, at 23:32, Nick Coghlan wrote: Brian Quinlan wrote: Getting rid of the process-global state like this simplifies testing (both testing of the executors themselves and of application code which uses them). It also eliminates the unpleasant interpreter shutdown/module globals int