On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> They are related to the Chinese numbering system. I recall U+4EAC
> having that value from my textbooks (it's the "kyo" in Tokyo, and the
> "jing" in "Beijing", so quite memorable), and U+5793 looks familiar
> (it's not otherwise used
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:03:17 am average wrote:
>> presently). That includes dir() too and probably others.
>
> You are confused -- globals() and locals() don't return lists.
Yeah, this thread is mostly a mess (what would nonlocals() return
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:03:17 am average wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Nick Coghlan
wrote:
> > Steve Bonner wrote:
> >> What do we think of adding a built-in nonlocals() function that
> >> would be similar to globals() and locals()? Like those functions,
> >> it would return a dictionar
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, MRAB wrote:
> Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
>>
>> 2010/4/4 MRAB :
>>>
>>> I've just downloaded the daily snapshot at
>>> http://svn.python.org/snapshots/python.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> In the header file /python/Modules/unicodedata_db.h, there are the
>>> following lines in t
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Steve Bonner wrote:
>> What do we think of adding a built-in nonlocals() function that would
>> be similar to globals() and locals()? Like those functions, it would
>> return a dictionary of variable names and their values. Since we now
>> hav
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
2010/4/4 MRAB :
I've just downloaded the daily snapshot at
http://svn.python.org/snapshots/python.tar.bz2
In the header file /python/Modules/unicodedata_db.h, there are the
following lines in the change_records_3_2_0 struct:
{ 255, 255, 255, 255, 1.0 },
Le Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:45:57 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> 2010/4/3 Benjamin Peterson :
>> I am delaying the release of 2.7 beta 1 pending the fixing of
>> http://bugs.python.org/issue8108 and the greening of the buildbots.
>
> After consultation with Antoine I've lowered #8108's priority.
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc writes:
> I don't think so. Unicode 3.2 did contain two entries with large
> numeric values. The file Unihan-3.2.0.txt contains these two
> lines:
>
> U+4EAC kPrimaryNumeric 10,000,000,000,000,000 ten quadrillion
> (American)
> U+5793 kPrimaryNumeric 100,
2010/4/4 MRAB :
> I've just downloaded the daily snapshot at
> http://svn.python.org/snapshots/python.tar.bz2
>
> In the header file /python/Modules/unicodedata_db.h, there are the
> following lines in the change_records_3_2_0 struct:
>
> { 255, 255, 255, 255, 1.0 },
> { 255, 255, 255
