2010/4/6 Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz writes:
Maybe it would be better to deprecate globals() and locals()
and replace them with another function called something like
scope().
It is useful to distinguish between globals (i.e.,
Reid Kleckner wrote:
If I remember correctly, the exec statement is going away in py3k, and
calling exec() with one argument can modify the local scope.
I've been kind of wondering what the deal is with exec in py3.
I always thought the reason for making exec a statement was so
that locals
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Except none of the things mentioned above is actually a Python
compiler.
No, but they grapple with many of the same issues that a Python
compiler would face, and it would be informative to see how
they tackle those issues. If you want to advance the state of
the art,
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
--
anatoly t.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:54 PM, will...@ufpa.br wrote:
for a college project, I proposed to create a compiler for python. I've
read something about it and maybe I saw that made a bad choice. I hear
everyone's opinion respond.
Depending on your taste, you may want to tackle something like a
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
--
Senthil
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
2010/4/6 Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz
Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
It will certainly. There's MUCH that can be optimized to let CPython
squeeze more performance from static analysis (even a gross one) on locals.
But can the existing locals() function be implemented in
the face of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently we added -Wd flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
question and I think the answer should be in the archives,
Jesus Cea wrote:
Recently we added -Wd flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
question and I think the answer should be in the archives, somewhere.
I studied the code ;)
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
Pythin and compilers). But I saw that I can use what I
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nzwrote:
Reid Kleckner wrote:
If I remember correctly, the exec statement is going away in py3k, and
calling exec() with one argument can modify the local scope.
I've been kind of wondering what the deal is with exec in
On 06/04/2010 12:44, will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
Pythin
Senthil Kumaran orsenthil at gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
The fact that the log shows some test failures isn't very comforting.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 04:19, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
Jesus Cea wrote:
Recently we added -Wd flags to buildbots. I was wondering about the
effect of it. documentation doesn't help.
I could study the code, but I guess other people can have the very same
question and I think
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting these stats on python.org?
Wouldn't status imply that there is a plan to do
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
http://coverage.livinglogic.de/
Thank you. What is the status of getting
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:42, C. Titus Brown c...@msu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:36:14PM +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Where can I find public reports with Python tests code coverage?
Here:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:41, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Brett Cannon brett at python.org writes:
Nope, you got it right. A little bit of documentation is in
2.7: http://docs.python.org/dev/library/warnings.html#updating-code-for-
It is a bit disturbing, though, that
Michael Foord wrote:
*However*, a project that would be interesting - and that I have wanted
to do in order to program microcontrollers with *very* small memory
address spaces [1] - would be to compile a static subset of Python down
to C.
That would be an excellent project -- if the result
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most basic idea involving
Pythin and compilers). But
On 06/04/2010 23:31, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought about making a compiler for it (most
On 06/04/2010 23:34, Michael Foord wrote:
On 06/04/2010 23:31, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
will...@ufpa.br wrote:
First, thank you for all opnion. Each one was considered.
I think the better question would be:
I have to develop a project that involves compilers, and being a fan of
Python, I thought
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
I propose that we freeze the trunk except for fixes for the buildbots.
Thoughts?
Freezing sounds fine with me.
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 04:25:08 pm Cesare Di Mauro wrote:
It will certainly. There's MUCH that can be optimized to let CPython
squeeze more performance from static analysis (even a gross one) on
locals.
[...]
They are just dummy examples, but can make it clear how far
optimizations can go with
Can someone (Steve Turnbull?) confirm or refute my analysis?
Refute, see http://bugs.python.org/issue804885
ISO-2022 input will
be 7-bit, and the except will not trigger
This conclusion is false:
1. it is 7-bit
py unichr(913).encode(iso-2022-jp)
'\x1b$B!\x1b(B'
2. the except *will*
On Apr 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I now have a working implementation of PEP 3147 which passes all the existing,
and new, tests. I'm sure there's still work to do, but I think the branch
is in good enough shape to start getting some feedback from python-dev.
Thanks to Antoine
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:18:13 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=
mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Can someone (Steve Turnbull?) confirm or refute my analysis?
Refute, see http://bugs.python.org/issue804885
ISO-2022 input will
be 7-bit, and the except will not trigger
This
2010/4/6 Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org:
On Apr 01, 2010, at 04:12 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I now have a working implementation of PEP 3147 which passes all the existing,
and new, tests. I'm sure there's still work to do, but I think the branch
is in good enough shape to start getting some
28 matches
Mail list logo
