Steve Holden wrote:
I'm sure we wouldn't want to go so far as to inhibit this. (Py 3.1)
def f(**kwargs):
... kwargs[1] = dummy
... print(kwargs)
...
f(this=Guido, that=Raymond, the_other=Steve)
{'this': 'Guido', 1: 'dummy', 'the_other': 'Steve', 'that': 'Raymond'}
Or would we? If
Victor Stinner wrote:
If we support OS/2, we need a buildbot.
As Andrew said, there are 2 levels of support - the if we break it,
we'll fix it level where our buildbots live, and the we won't go out
of our way to break it, but it may degenerate as other things change (or
simply miss out on some
Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
It is nice to get
heads-up messages about issues that might involve such support though,
and it shouldn't take much searching to find me to enquire.
Especially since aimacintyre is listed in Misc/maintainers.rst.
___
On 16 Apr 2010, at 23:31 , Guido van Rossum wrote:
+1.
Apparently dict(x, **y) is going around as cool hack for call
x.update(y) and return x. Personally I find it more despicable than
cool.
This description doesn't make sense since `dict(x, **y)` returns not
an updated `x` but a new
Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com writes:
I'm sure we wouldn't want to go so far as to inhibit this. (Py 3.1)
def f(**kwargs):
... kwargs[1] = dummy
... print(kwargs)
...
f(this=Guido, that=Raymond, the_other=Steve)
{'this': 'Guido', 1: 'dummy', 'the_other': 'Steve', 'that':
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I'm sure we wouldn't want to go so far as to inhibit this. (Py 3.1)
def f(**kwargs):
... kwargs[1] = dummy
... print(kwargs)
...
f(this=Guido, that=Raymond, the_other=Steve)
{'this': 'Guido', 1: 'dummy',
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
I'm sure we wouldn't want to go so far as to inhibit this. (Py 3.1)
def f(**kwargs):
... kwargs[1] = dummy
... print(kwargs)
...
f(this=Guido, that=Raymond, the_other=Steve)
{'this':
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com writes:
I'm sure we wouldn't want to go so far as to inhibit this. (Py 3.1)
def f(**kwargs):
... kwargs[1] = dummy
... print(kwargs)
...
f(this=Guido, that=Raymond,
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the object the callee sees as 'kwargs' is
just a dict.
Huh, I thought kwargs was allowed to be implemented as a
string-keys-only dict (similar to class and module namespaces) while
still be a valid Python implementation. I guess I was wrong.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the object the callee sees as 'kwargs' is
just a dict.
Huh, I thought kwargs was allowed to be implemented as a
string-keys-only dict (similar to class and module
Hi,
http://bugs.python.org/ displays Service Temporarily Unavailable. Is it
normal?
--
Victor Stinner
http://www.haypocalc.com/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
http://bugs.python.org/ displays Service Temporarily Unavailable. Is it
normal?
It's working fine for me.
--
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC http://stutzbachenterprises.com
2010/4/17 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the object the callee sees as 'kwargs' is
just a dict.
Huh, I thought kwargs was allowed to be implemented as a
Benjamin wrote:
2010/4/17 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the object the callee sees as 'kwargs'
is
just a dict.
Huh, I thought kwargs was allowed to be
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
2010/4/17 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the object the callee sees
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
Brian Curtin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:20, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com
mailto:techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
Maciej wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
2010/4/17 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Because Python promises that the
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
Maciej wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
2010/4/17 Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Nick Coghlan
Works for me too.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Daniel Stutzbach
dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
http://bugs.python.org/ displays Service Temporarily Unavailable. Is it
normal?
It's working
Hi,
Ezio and Florent are developing a tool called bbreport to collect buildbot
results and generate short reports to the command line. It's possible to
filter results by Python branch, builder name, etc. I send patches to link
failed tests to existing issues to see quickly known failures vs
Dino Viehland wrote:
Maciej wrote:
[...]
And yet that breaks some code :-)
Sure, if you do:
class C(object):
locals()[object()] = 42
dir(C)
You lose. Once I'm aware of some piece of code in the wild doing this
then I'll be happy to change IronPython to be more compatible. :)
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Ezio and Florent are developing a tool called bbreport to collect buildbot
results and generate short reports to the command line. It's possible to
filter results by Python branch, builder name, etc. I send
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de writes:
This actually happened on Windows - some people now
recommend to run the buildbot scripts on a regular developer checkout,
because they supposedly do the right things.
I have to admit that I'm guilty of this (though to be fair
David Bolen wrote:
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de writes:
This actually happened on Windows - some people now
recommend to run the buildbot scripts on a regular developer checkout,
because they supposedly do the right things.
I have to admit that I'm guilty of
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
Dino Viehland wrote:
Maciej wrote:
[...]
And yet that breaks some code :-)
Sure, if you do:
class C(object):
locals()[object()] = 42
dir(C)
You lose. Once I'm aware of some piece of code in the wild doing
25 matches
Mail list logo
