[Python-Dev] multi-version parallel-installed modules

2010-08-18 Thread Neal Becker
Is there any proposal to accommodate having parallel-installed multiple versions of modules? I have client code in multiple projects using version x.y of a C-compiled module A. I want to test a new version x.z of module A, but all client software needs to be recompiled against the new

Re: [Python-Dev] multi-version parallel-installed modules

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Foord
On 18/08/2010 15:34, Neal Becker wrote: Is there any proposal to accommodate having parallel-installed multiple versions of modules? I have client code in multiple projects using version x.y of a C-compiled module A. I want to test a new version x.z of module A, but all client software needs

Re: [Python-Dev] multi-version parallel-installed modules

2010-08-18 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Michael Foord wrote: On 18/08/2010 15:34, Neal Becker wrote: Is there any proposal to accommodate having parallel-installed multiple versions of modules? You can easily implement such a setup by placing the module versions into a separate dir and then adding the right version dir to you

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r84166 - python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt

2010-08-18 Thread Jesse Noller
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote: 2010/8/17 martin.v.loewis python-check...@python.org: Author: martin.v.loewis Date: Wed Aug 18 00:58:42 2010 New Revision: 84166 Log: Add Ask Solem. Modified:   python/branches/py3k/Misc/developers.txt

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Foord
Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python 2.7 as stable? All the best, Michael Original Message Subject:Old link text in documentation Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:49:34 -0700 From: Aaron DeVore aaron.dev...@gmail.com To:

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation

2010-08-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord: Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python 2.7 as stable? I think the answer is no, it could not. How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and regenerate them? There is also

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation

2010-08-18 Thread Michael Foord
On 18/08/2010 21:59, Martin v. Löwis wrote: Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord: Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python 2.7 as stable? I think the answer is no, it could not. How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and

Re: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Old link text in documentation

2010-08-18 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 18.08.2010 20:59, schrieb Martin v. Löwis: Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord: Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python 2.7 as stable? I think the answer is no, it could not. How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and