Le 12/10/2010 01:11, Giampaolo Rodolà a écrit :
> Wouldn't be kinda weird that one can open the command prompt and run
> "pysetup" but not "python" on Windows?
> I recall an old issue on the bug tracker in which the latter proposal
> was widely discussed and finally rejected for reasons I can't rem
On 10/11/2010 5:17 PM, Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
2010/10/8 Eric Smith:
On 10/8/10 10:26 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
In any case, these could be a simple shell script wrapping 'python -m
setup'.
It could even take a --use-python-version option to select the pythonX.Y
it
used, without having to encode
2010/10/12 Antoine Pitrou :
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:11:24 +0200
> Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
>> Wouldn't be kinda weird that one can open the command prompt and run
>> "pysetup" but not "python" on Windows?
>
> If you add C:\PythonXY to your path, you can run "python".
I know. My point was you can'
Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
Wouldn't be kinda weird that one can open the command prompt and run
"pysetup" but not "python" on Windows?
I recall an old issue on the bug tracker in which the latter proposal
was widely discussed and finally rejected for reasons I can't remember
On Windows I think it'
Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
If that's the case what would I type in the command prompt in order to
install a module?
"C:\PythonXX\pysetup.exe"?
If so I would strongly miss old "setup.py install".
Another thing bothers me about this. With the current scheme,
if you have multiple Pythons available,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:11:24 +0200
Giampaolo Rodolà wrote:
> Wouldn't be kinda weird that one can open the command prompt and run
> "pysetup" but not "python" on Windows?
If you add C:\PythonXY to your path, you can run "python".
Regards
Antoine.
__
Wouldn't be kinda weird that one can open the command prompt and run
"pysetup" but not "python" on Windows?
I recall an old issue on the bug tracker in which the latter proposal
was widely discussed and finally rejected for reasons I can't remember
(and it seems I can't even find the bug right now)
2010/10/8 Eric Smith :
> On 10/8/10 10:26 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> In any case, these could be a simple shell script wrapping 'python -m
>> setup'.
>> It could even take a --use-python-version option to select the pythonX.Y
>> it
>> used, without having to encode the Python version number in the
On 10/11/2010 07:27 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
This is almost certainly failing because the directory containing the
spyderlib package isn't on sys.path anywhere (instead, whichever
d
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Hehe. What's the story behind changing the name from Cheeseshop to PyPI btw
> ?
> I found the first one much nicer
A through investigation revealed that the Cheeseshop did not in fact have
any cheese at all. Not even Wensleydale.
--
Daniel
Am 08.10.2010 17:21, schrieb Michael Foord:
> On 08/10/2010 16:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Oct 08, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>>
>>> python-setup is a lot like python setup.py
>>> pysetup is shorter
>>> pyegg is even shorter :-)
>> wfm!
>
> To avoid any potential confusion, wfm
On Oct 08, 2010, at 03:40 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>Richard Jones is the authority on the story, but from what I can
>remember from the discussion it was decided that managers would have
>had issues with using a service called the Cheeseshop. So basically
>the idea of professional-sounding name won
2010/10/11 Ioan Ferencik :
> I would like to ask where can I find more detailed info on
> PyArg_ParseTuple function.
See python-list.
>
> I find the doc limited on the matter.
> Mainly I am curious why the function requires an address of a pointer.
So it can change the pointer.
--
Regards,
I would like to ask where can I find more detailed info on
PyArg_ParseTuple function.
I find the doc limited on the matter.
Mainly I am curious why the function requires an address of a pointer.
I have issues in the following case:
in python
int jmax = 16
print type(jmax)
which is just all
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:54 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> This is almost certainly failing because the directory containing the
>> spyderlib package isn't on sys.path anywhere (instead, whichever
>> directory contains the script you execut
On 2010-10-11, at 07:56 , Carl M. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Zac Burns wrote:
>> This could be generalized and placed into itertools if we create a function
>> (say, apply for lack of a better name at the moment) that takes in an
>> iterable and creates new iterables that yi
16 matches
Mail list logo