Re: [Python-Dev] Is Demo directory removed from python3.2 ?

2011-02-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, wen heping wrote: > Hi, > >   I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version: >   i) Demo directory removed >   ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1  changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1 Others have answered your first question, but the latter is part of P

Re: [Python-Dev] Is Demo directory removed from python3.2 ?

2011-02-21 Thread Jack Diederich
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:02 PM, wen heping wrote: > Hi, > >   I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version: >   i) Demo directory removed >   ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1  changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1 > >   Would someone tell me why ? The demo directory was largely out

Re: [Python-Dev] Is Demo directory removed from python3.2 ?

2011-02-21 Thread Brian Curtin
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 21:02, wen heping wrote: > Hi, > > I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version: > i) Demo directory removed >From the "What's new in 3.2" document: The unmaintained Demo directory has been removed. Some demos were integrated into the documenta

[Python-Dev] Is Demo directory removed from python3.2 ?

2011-02-21 Thread wen heping
Hi, I found 2 changes in python-3.2 compared to previous python version: i) Demo directory removed ii) lib/libpython3.2.so.1 changed to lib/libpython3.2mu.so.1 Would someone tell me why ? Thanks at advance. wen ___ Python-Dev mailing l

[Python-Dev] Mail System Error - Returned Mail

2011-02-21 Thread wst
The original message was received at Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:29:51 +0700 from pancaprima.com [196.86.11.104] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r88484 - in python/branches/py3k: Lib/test/subprocessdata/fd_status.py Lib/test/test_subprocess.py Misc/NEWS

2011-02-21 Thread Victor Stinner
Le 21/02/2011 22:55, antoine.pitrou a écrit : Author: antoine.pitrou Date: Mon Feb 21 22:55:48 2011 New Revision: 88484 Log: Issue #10826: Prevent sporadic failure in test_subprocess on Solaris due to open door files. if __name__ == "__main__": -print(','.join(str(fd) for fd in range(

[Python-Dev] Const-correctness in C-API Object Protocol

2011-02-21 Thread David Claridge
Hi, I was wondering if there is some reason why C API functions like PyObject_CallMethod[1] and PySys_GetObject[2] take char* arguments rather than const char*s? If there is some reason these methods will modify their string arguments, it would be nice if it was documented, because at the moment i

Re: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135

2011-02-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following >> PEPs from being marked Final? >> >>  SA  389  argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module              Bethard

Re: [Python-Dev] Distutils2 next steps

2011-02-21 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: ... >> - distutils2 will continue to be released as a standalone project from >> 2.4 to 3.2. Probably by using 3to2, but I have not tried the tool yet. > > So does this mean that primary development will move to py3k and then > you will simply p

Re: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135

2011-02-21 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 04:52, Nick Coghlan wrote: > As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following > PEPs from being marked Final? > >  SA  389  argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module              Bethard >  SA  391  Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging            

Re: [Python-Dev] Distutils2 next steps

2011-02-21 Thread Brett Cannon
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 00:02, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: >> On 21.02.2011 08:41, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Now that Python 3.2 is out, I am planning to do the following with >>> Distutils2: >>> >>> 1 - release a new alpha before Pycon fo

Re: [Python-Dev] Bug in linking to gomp with python; causes crash in matplotlib.

2011-02-21 Thread Hoyt Koepke
> An associated bug report would be appreciated (mailing list > discussions are useful for raising awareness, but are more likely to > be forgotten over time than bug reports): http://bugs.python.org Just did that; thanks! -- Hoyt + Hoyt Koepke +

Re: [Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135

2011-02-21 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following > PEPs from being marked Final? > >  SA  389  argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module              Bethard >  SA  391  Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging          

[Python-Dev] Are these PEP complete?: 389, 391, 3108, 3135

2011-02-21 Thread Nick Coghlan
As the subject line asks, is there anything preventing the following PEPs from being marked Final? SA 389 argparse - New Command Line Parsing Module Bethard SA 391 Dictionary-Based Configuration For Logging Sajip SA 3108 Standard Library Reorganization

Re: [Python-Dev] Distutils2 next steps

2011-02-21 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > On 21.02.2011 08:41, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> Hello >> >> Now that Python 3.2 is out, I am planning to do the following with >> Distutils2: >> >> 1 - release a new alpha before Pycon for community feedback >> 2 - add distutils2 back in the trunk