On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:45:47PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> hg log -k "contributor name"
>>
>> Also, memory helps although it's quite perfectible :)
>>
>> At worse, we'll have a couple of false positives and we'll have to
>> apologize
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:45:47PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> hg log -k "contributor name"
>
> Also, memory helps although it's quite perfectible :)
>
> At worse, we'll have a couple of false positives and we'll have to
> apologize to them...
There are about 948 folks in the Misc/ACKS and ma
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 22:24 +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
> I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
> contributors, as in:
>
> First, we did a survey of all our past d
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou writes:
>
> > Following the example given in the original article, I was considering
> > a single freeform question: "why did you stop contributing after your
> > last patch to CPython?" (of course, that text should be
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> Following the example given in the original article, I was considering
> a single freeform question: "why did you stop contributing after your
> last patch to CPython?" (of course, that text should be decorated with
> a greeting and an introduction and the wording can
On 03/01/2011 01:22 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 01.03.2011 16:05, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:52:58 +0200
Eli Bendersky wrote:
The PEP (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/) says in "Timeline":
2010-03-05: final conversion (tentative)
I assume 2011-03-05 is meant here.
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 01:14:32AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I think a PEP would help, but in this case I would request that before
> > the PEP gets written (it can be a really short one!) somebody actually
> > go out and get consensus from a number of important distros. Besides
> > Barry
On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:45:51 +0100
"Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> >> I believe we agreed at the language summit last year (or maybe even the
> >> year before) that "python" would always be python2.x, and "python3"
> >> would be python3.x.
> >>
> >> And by "always" we indeed meant forever. To do othe
> I think a PEP would help, but in this case I would request that before
> the PEP gets written (it can be a really short one!) somebody actually
> go out and get consensus from a number of important distros. Besides
> Barry, do we have any representatives of distros here?
Matthias Klose represent
On 02/03/11 08:06, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
Hello,
There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
/usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the
documentation to rec
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>>> I believe we agreed at the language summit last year (or maybe even the
>>> year before) that "python" would always be python2.x, and "python3"
>>> would be python3.x.
>>>
>>> And by "always" we indeed meant forever. To do otherwise woul
>> I believe we agreed at the language summit last year (or maybe even the
>> year before) that "python" would always be python2.x, and "python3"
>> would be python3.x.
>>
>> And by "always" we indeed meant forever. To do otherwise would break
>> scripts even many, many years from now.
>
> It s
Am 02.03.2011 00:16, schrieb Kerrick Staley:
> I think that it's a good idea to not only state that python should be
> Python 2, but also that python2 should be implemented and that scripts
> should specify it, to provide redundancy and handle distros that won't
> or have not yet switched back to t
I think that it's a good idea to not only state that python should be Python
2, but also that python2 should be implemented and that scripts should
specify it, to provide redundancy and handle distros that won't or have not
yet switched back to the python -> python2 convention. I've . In any event,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:05:25 -0600
s...@pobox.com wrote:
>
> Antoine> Well, "make buildbottest" should do the trick.
>
> Perhaps it should be given a somewhat less specialized sounding name...
It *is* specialized since it's meant primarily for the buildbots :)
It happens to be usable by anyon
Antoine> Well, "make buildbottest" should do the trick.
Perhaps it should be given a somewhat less specialized sounding name...
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:49:42 -0600
s...@pobox.com wrote:
>
> Antoine> We already have "make test" and "make buildbottest" in addition
> Antoine> to "./python -m test". I think another subtly different way of
> Antoine> running the tests would be a nuisance.
>
> I see nothing wrong with
Antoine> We already have "make test" and "make buildbottest" in addition
Antoine> to "./python -m test". I think another subtly different way of
Antoine> running the tests would be a nuisance.
I see nothing wrong with "make rigoroustest" or "make brutaltest". I
routinely use "make te
Le mardi 01 mars 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
> 2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
> > On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:23:42 -0600
> > Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> >> 2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
> >> >
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > In
> >> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-Februa
2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:23:42 -0600
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > In
>> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
>> > I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of p
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:23:42 -0600
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > In
> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
> > I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
> > contributors, as in:
> >
> >
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:12:14 -0500
Jesse Noller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > In
> > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
> > I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
> > cont
2011/3/1 Antoine Pitrou :
>
> Hello,
>
> In
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
> I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
> contributors, as in:
>
> First, we did a survey of all our past developers who had left
>
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:26:05 -0500, Eric Smith wrote:
> On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
> > Hello,
> > There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
> > /usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the
> > documentation to recommend that packagers ensu
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
>> On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
>>> /usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html,
> I was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past
> contributors, as in:
>
> First, we did a survey of all our past deve
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
>> /usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the
>> documentation to recommend that packagers ensure th
2011-03-01 22:50:34 Kerrick Staley napisał(a):
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> > On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
> >> /usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the
I understand, but is it at least possible to officially recommend that
python, python2, and python3 all exist, that distributions point python to
python2, and that scripts specify which of python2 and python3 they are
using? This would create a redundant system that doesn't avoids problems
even if
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Kerrick Staley wrote:
Hello,
There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
/usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the
documentation to recommend that packagers ensure that python2 is
defined. Also, all documentation should be changed t
Hello,
In
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2011-February/001340.html, I
was asking whether it would be useful to make a survey of past contributors, as
in:
First, we did a survey of all our past developers who had left
the project, asking them why they had lef
Hello,
There is a need for the default Python2 install to place a symlink at
/usr/bin/python2 that points to /usr/bin/python, or for the documentation to
recommend that packagers ensure that python2 is defined. Also, all
documentation should be changed to recommend that "#!/usr/bin/env python2"
be
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:36:29 +0100
Éric Araujo wrote:
> > user:Antoine Pitrou
> > date:Tue Mar 01 20:51:42 2011 +0100
> > summary:
> > Update instructions to use the new "server-side clone" button
>
> That’s seriously awesome.
>
> Where can we have a look at the implementation
On 01.03.2011 21:36, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> user:Antoine Pitrou
>> date:Tue Mar 01 20:51:42 2011 +0100
>> summary:
>> Update instructions to use the new "server-side clone" button
>
> That’s seriously awesome.
>
> Where can we have a look at the implementation?
Have a guess :)
> user:Antoine Pitrou
> date:Tue Mar 01 20:51:42 2011 +0100
> summary:
> Update instructions to use the new "server-side clone" button
That’s seriously awesome.
Where can we have a look at the implementation?
A remark: Having all clones created under a dedicated namespace (say
The biggest problem with make test is it is not exactly the same as the
script (e.g., no automatic -j usage). It also is not cross-platform since
Windows dev's are left out without installing cygwin. And we can't simply
use -m test as that leaves out flags passed to the interpreter.
On Mar 1, 2011
On 01.03.2011 16:05, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:52:58 +0200
> Eli Bendersky wrote:
>> The PEP (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/) says in "Timeline":
>>
>> 2010-03-05: final conversion (tentative)
>>
>> I assume 2011-03-05 is meant here.
>
> Oh... I guess I was a bit o
On 01.03.2011 14:45, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
>> list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
>
> I actually assumed it was something like that, but assumptions are
> deucedl
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:52:58 +0200
Eli Bendersky wrote:
> The PEP (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/) says in "Timeline":
>
> 2010-03-05: final conversion (tentative)
>
> I assume 2011-03-05 is meant here.
Oh... I guess I was a bit optimistic.
Thanks for noticing
Antoine.
The PEP (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0385/) says in "Timeline":
2010-03-05: final conversion (tentative)
I assume 2011-03-05 is meant here.
Eli
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 20:22, antoine.pitrou wrote:
> Author: antoine.pitrou
> Date: Mon Feb 28 19:22:36 2011
> New Revision: 88676
>
> Lo
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
> list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
I actually assumed it was something like that, but assumptions are
deucedly dangerous things with an annoying habit of biting
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:36:38 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:03 AM, brett.cannon
> wrote:
> > brett.cannon pushed 3e5a61adb41d to devinabox:
> >
> > http://hg.python.org/devinabox/rev/3e5a61adb41d
> > changeset: 8:3e5a61adb41d
> > user: Brett Cannon
> > date:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:03 AM, brett.cannon wrote:
> brett.cannon pushed 3e5a61adb41d to devinabox:
>
> http://hg.python.org/devinabox/rev/3e5a61adb41d
> changeset: 8:3e5a61adb41d
> user: Brett Cannon
> date: Fri Feb 25 17:35:37 2011 -0800
> summary:
> Add a Python script which
> Remember there's no tone of voice, facial expressions or body language
> on the internet
This linguist approves.
> smileys are your friend when kidding around :)
All French core developers know I’m French too, but other people on this
list could have mistaken me, you’re right.
Cheers
__
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> I really meant superfetatory
>
> Those damn French people with their foreign words.
Remember there's no tone of voice, facial expressions or body language
on the internet - smileys are your friend when kidding around :)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nic
45 matches
Mail list logo
